See You Next Tuesday

2004_10_28.womannews.jpgAh yes, the WomanNews section of the Tribune. Did you notice it was missing yesterday from your print edition? We didn't because 1) we read the Trib online and 2) we can't remember the last time we read an article in WomanNews that wasn't idiotic. And about Relationships. Or Breasts. (Which reminds us, it's still breast cancer month, and if you haven't done your self-exam, get to it.) Or about how Women Love Shopping. Anyhow, we don't usually flip to that section. But even if we had wanted to yesterday, we couldn't—at the very last minute, the section was yanked because senior editors deemed one of the articles too lewd. The section had already been printed, so Tribune staffers had to head over to the printing press and remove the section by hand. Damn. If you work at the Tribune and want to tell us a first-hand account of this, e-mail us. That sounds hilarious.

So what was so offensive? A story titled You c_nt say that (or can you?). Whoa. No, seriously, whoa. According to Crain's, "Quoting academics, cultural commentators and everyday women, the report explored the stigma surrounding a word the story never actually mentions." The one time the Trib runs a WomanNews story that might actually be interesting or relevant, it gets pulled. Great. Where's the letter from the public editor on this one?

We'll admit, the c-word is a pretty touchy subject. Julia Roberts and Natalie Portman apparently exchanged necklaces that said "Cunt" and "L'il Cunt"—sorry, did you need that dashed out?—while filming Closer, as some kind of inside joke. Ahahaha. Maybe they're trying to reclaim it, like from that Vagina Monologue. Oh, whoops: v-gina. Yes, this still ranks up there as one of the most vulgar terms in the English language, it's one of the few still-applicable "seven words you can't say on television" (shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker and tits), and probably rightfully so. Chicagoist has quite a potty mouth (perhaps you've noticed), and that's still one of the only words we never, ever use. Hi Mommy, by the way. Maybe the pristine Chicago Tribune isn't the place to explore the word's role in language and pop-culture, but…well, maybe it is.

Update: Newcity's take on "c-nt-gate".

Email This Entry


Comments (9) [rss]

As demonstrated by their Op-Ed endorsement the Trib prefer the term Bush to Cunt.

Too bad, honestly, because I think that's an important gender topic worth discussing. There is a whole genre of art called "Cunt Art," for instance--I think it would have been really refreshing to see the piece in the WN section. I wonder where it rests now.

Good lord but I despise the WomanNews section. It makes me feel dumb and vacuous and like a person who'd hump her new Pontiac from Oprah while shrieking and sobbing in happiness. Here's a feature on a woman with 300 pairs of shoes! And a woman who's addicted to her lipstick! How to cope with those silly boys who dump you! whee!

Now an article on "that word," though--that I'd read.

rocking headline. so many levels, so little time. i tip my merkin to you.

Historical Note: A single utterance of the word in question got "Harry and Tonto" its X-Rating.

Ditto on the headline. Second-best Chicagoist headline ever. :-)

james, what's the first best?

Rachelle,

That honor was recently taken by this post.

-- James :-)

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

About Chicagoist

Chicagoist is a website about Chicago. More

Editor: Marcus Gilmer
Publisher: Gothamist

Contribute

Latest Tip:

KOI ... pet fish you can really pet !
[more]

Latest Photo:

Recent Comments

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Chicagoist.

All Our RSS