Chicago Destined for Housing Bust? Maybe Not...

2005_7_forsale.jpgChalk it up to the fact that Chicagoist is mildly preoccupied with the real estate industry, or that we're hopelessly addicted to Curbed... but we kinda feel like everyone and their realtor are talking about a "housing bubble" these days. Are home prices really about to plummet across the nation, ending a multi-year boom for the residential real estate sector? Will the granite countertops and stainless steel appliances of today be the worthless Beanie Babies of tomorrow?

According to the folks at the PMI Mortgage Insurance Company, publishers of a quarterly US Market Risk Index... maybe not! PMI's most recent study of the nation's 50 largest housing markets indicates that, while some markets are essentially screwed (uh, sorry Boston, New York and San Diego), Chicago isn't necessarily one of them. Cities teetering closest to a crash are estimated to have a bust potential topping 50 percent, while Chicago's risk level is estimated at only 9.2 percent. That puts us on thirty-third on the list, on a level playing field with Houston and Phoenix, only slightly worse off than St. Louis.

So, how do these PMI folks figure this stuff out? According to them...

The Risk Index is a proprietary statistical model that measures geographic house-price risk by predicting the probability of a regional decline in home prices in the nation's 50 largest metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) and metropolitan statistical area divisions (MSADs) over the next two years. The PMI US Market Risk Index is based on the House Price Index from the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), labor market statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the PMI affordability index, which uses local median household income, home price appreciation and the price of a conventional mortgage to calculate the local share of mortgage payment to income relative to its baseline year of 1995.

(Crickets chirp... Chicagoist scratches its head and looks for someone with glasses that can understand what this means....)

Ok, we think got it! PMI monitors home affordability in a given area, and compares prices with the region's median incomes and annual salary increases to see if things are getting out of hand. In Boston, New York and San Diego, home prices must be increasing so quickly that, pretty soon, people just won't be able to pay for them.

So, where does that leave us? Seems like Chicagoland homeowners are in a pretty good spot... especially if they're single! While we're talking lists, Forbes thinks we're the ninth best city for singles, scoring especially high in the "coolness" and "job growth" categories (take that, Phoenix and St. Louis!). In the meantime, Forbes also thinks we're the fourth most overpriced U.S. city, so who cares what they think?

At least we know our money only has a 9.2 percent chance of going away...

Email This Entry


Comments (2) [rss]

I think that the phrase "proprietary statistical model" is the clue that you're not supposed to be able to understand it. "Marvel and wonder at our gleeming information! Do not dare to question it for it is proprietary! Our black box is infallible!"

As a region "Chicagoland" might be ok, but I think sub-markets such as Streeterville, River North, South Loop, and other condo hotspots are at much great risk. A good chunk of these condos are being sold to/by "flippers". Regional/city statistics won't pick up these micro-area bubbles.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

About Chicagoist

Chicagoist is a website about Chicago. More

Editor: Marcus Gilmer
Publisher: Gothamist

Contribute

Latest Tip:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelmech/4128230721
[more]

Latest Photo:

Recent Comments

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Chicagoist.

All Our RSS