Chicagoist: Richard Roeper Totally Hearts Us

Dave!

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:37:18 -0600

You really should take that photo of them down though, if I want to see pasty white guys trying to hide flab in suits, I'll go to Mortons, OK? I'll walk down Michigan Avenue or go to the Tribune Tower... :)

Zach

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:09:57 -0600

I wonder why this isn't in Ebert's links... http://media1.break.com/content/siskelebert.wmv

Moon

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:20:26 -0600

Well, I've got to go with Roeper on this one. It might be the first time I picked Roeper over Ebert. /I avoid the little gossip sites, though. Who needs to know what the gossip is in New York??? And perezhilton.com just sounds awful, but I've never been there.

Jeanne

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:08:21 -0600

Instead of perezhilton.com, read thesuperficial.com for funnier comments

Stephen

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:06:12 -0600

I suppoooossse . . .

rachelle bowden

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:58:53 -0600

you're right chuck. it's hard to see but after saying he likes rogerebert.com, roger says "site devoted to thousands of reviews and other writings by probably my favorite movie critic"

chuck

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:19:30 -0600

Or maybe Roger was just being typically tongue-in-cheek with the cheap plug? His site is worth it for his "Great Movie" essay series alone.

Stephen

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:12:19 -0600

And really, listing your own site seems a little arrogant to me. Of course you think you're site is useful. Maybe it wasn't meant that way, but it just strikes me that way.

tien

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:15:19 -0600

could roger's list be a little more boring??