<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: The Interview: Pitchfork Media&apos;s Ryan Schreiber</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/10/the_interview_pitchfork_medias_ryan_schreiber.php</link>
<description>All comments for The Interview: Pitchfork Media&apos;s Ryan Schreiber</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>pat</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/10/the_interview_pitchfork_medias_ryan_schreiber.php#comment-1060462</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/10/the_interview_pitchfork_medias_ryan_schreiber.php#comment-1060462</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:56:11 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The dude is trying to do something for chicago. he&apos;s stoked on chicago. i think that&apos;s great. also, the bands that are coming together will not be headlining Latin or Gospel fest anytime soon. I was hearing there are no festivals for his type of music. He definitly is putting something different together. I&apos;m jealous St. Louis doesn&apos;t have something similiar. Also, this dude reviews music...he&apos;s even placing on that stage music that got bad reviews. That&apos;s kinda cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>+m-</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/10/the_interview_pitchfork_medias_ryan_schreiber.php#comment-260542</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/10/the_interview_pitchfork_medias_ryan_schreiber.php#comment-260542</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:55:29 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;if you have to start a comment with &quot;i&apos;m sorry, but&quot; it&apos;s probably not worth saying.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>anthony bliss</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/10/the_interview_pitchfork_medias_ryan_schreiber.php#comment-260541</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/10/the_interview_pitchfork_medias_ryan_schreiber.php#comment-260541</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:52:22 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;actually, you seem to embody the attitute that gets in the way of a good festival.  and thirty bucks for a spectacularly billed weekend full of heavily touring bands that you would pay 15 bux to see a combo of any given three regularly is hardly capitalizing on the ignorance of the feeble minded masses.  are you trying to be, like, some uber-ironic hipster by spurting out ostentations comments criticizing someone elses pretentiousness?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Sarah</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/10/the_interview_pitchfork_medias_ryan_schreiber.php#comment-259958</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/10/the_interview_pitchfork_medias_ryan_schreiber.php#comment-259958</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:13:19 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Chicagoist should have been on this festival tip already, no?

If you refer to the bulk of Scott&apos;s music posts last week and/or the weekly round up, you can see that we were, indeed, ON IT.  Interviews just give us an opportunity for more in-depth coverage on a subject, dig?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mr. Smith</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/10/the_interview_pitchfork_medias_ryan_schreiber.php#comment-259953</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/10/the_interview_pitchfork_medias_ryan_schreiber.php#comment-259953</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:04:42 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;At least this Chicagoist interview isn&apos;t as sophomorically over-written as Pitchfork is.

Well, back-handed compliments are still compliments, I guess.

You know, last year&apos;s Pitchfork Fest was a really good time despite all the hullabaloo leading up to it.  There was very little sanctimonious attitude from either the people running it or the audience.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>pylbug</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/10/the_interview_pitchfork_medias_ryan_schreiber.php#comment-259951</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/10/the_interview_pitchfork_medias_ryan_schreiber.php#comment-259951</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:51:47 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m sorry, but this guy reminds me of those musicians who&apos;ll tell you they&apos;re not making music for anyone but themselves -- but still try desperately to get signed to record labels with the hope of selling their music to (you guessed it) anyone but themselves. 

&quot;Until last year, there weren&apos;t that many music festivals happening in Chicago.&quot;

Wow, the Pitchfork kid is seriously high on his own fumes right now.  There have been several music festivals in Chicago every year, and most will let you bring a chair and get in without paying to go to a city park for the day:  Blues Fest, Jazz Fest, Gospel Fest, Latin Music Fest... the list goes on.  

Chicagoist should have been on this festival tip already, no?  Maybe we can do a little more homework than the &quot;more-indie-than-thou&quot; Ryan Schreiber did next time?

At least this Chicagoist interview isn&apos;t as sophomorically over-written as Pitchfork is. The whole sanctimonious Pitchfork attitude is going to get in the way of a good festival. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>