<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Focus on Vinyl</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php</link>
<description>All comments for Focus on Vinyl</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Mitch Arsenie</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260829</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260829</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:13:53 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Mike, very much. Here&apos;s more of my work...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dreamerofmeaning/&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mike</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260781</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260781</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:51:07 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;a tripod makes for a great tripod. I&apos;d like to see some more of your work.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>a scientist</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260719</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260719</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:14:12 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;good point inre: tubes. distortion generated through digital processors can&apos;t hold a candle to actual overdriven tubes.

i&apos;ve noticed a definite &quot;woody&quot; tone that comes from a bass played through a nice tube amp. i&apos;ve never heard a digital effect that comes close to this.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>navin</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260706</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260706</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:00:20 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;As an owner of all formats from 78&apos;s to mp3s I can say that *old* quality made records definitely sound better, listen to an old 45 explode off the turntable and then listed to a cd of the same track *insert deflating baloon sound here*.  Tube driven equipment even better.  This isn&apos;t about not embracing technology, it&apos;s just *fact*.  Technology is getting better at quality warm sound but.....

There&apos;s a reason people want analog synthesizers
There&apos;s a reason older tube guitar amplifiers sell for more than solid state. etc. etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>a scientist</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260693</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260693</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:16:16 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i don&apos;t always like digital remastering. sometimes it&apos;s ok, but many times it changes the recording for the worse. i&apos;d like to cite black sabbath volume 4 as a prime example. so my arguement isn&apos;t that vinyl sounds better than digital/CD, but that vinyl, esp old vinyl, is more true to the original artistic vision. it hasn&apos;t had some greasy sound engineer&apos;s hands all over it after it was released...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Josh</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260688</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260688</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:19:43 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;<![CDATA[My hats off to pylbug for making a comment that I've wanted to shout from the rooftops for years (but haven't, for fear of being strung up by an army of posers).  

Vinyl's only power is to take the listener (typicly someone over 30, like myself) back to a past time and place.

It doesn't actually sound better.

Somone should make an add-on device for i-Pods that duplicates the scratching sound of vinyl that everyone seems to love.&nbsp;&nbsp;I'll bet it would sell like hotcakes.]]>&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mitch Arsenie</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260682</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260682</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:52:21 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the comments guys. Glad this sparked up some animated conversation. And yeah, vinyl rules!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ben</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260667</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260667</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:18:53 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;In an age when you can burn downloaded tracks onto CDs, LPs offer something a little more tangible and permanent for a little less money, and most of that money goes to small labels that give more to the artists.  For new LPs that is.  Viva vinyl!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>curmudgeon</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260665</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260665</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:54:31 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I GREW UP LISTENING TO VINYL. WHEN I DIVORCED THE EXTENSIVE VINYL COLLECTION (1700+ lp&apos;S) WAS A MAJOR CUSTODY BATTLE. AFTER ALL IS SAID AND DONE, DIGITAL IS MUCH BETTER SOUND-WISE, BUT ALBUM COVER ART IS A DEAD GENRE, AND THAT IS SAD.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mr. Smith</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260662</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260662</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:26:22 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The thing is, you need really good equipment and need to keep your vinyl in excellent condition to experience that warmth.  Unfortunately, it&apos;s not always possible for most people to achieve these optimal conditions.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Joel</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260661</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260661</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:17:11 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Both formats have their virtues&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Consumatron.com</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260658</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260658</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:09:03 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Vinyl is great regardless of the recording method for two primary reasons.  When DJing, it allows you the maximum control of your music as well as building your sense of timing and DJ fundamentals.  Also, no DRM or other copy protection on vinyl.  

Of course, if you really want to focus on vinyl, you should throw up a picture of Dusty Groove, not Reckless.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Consumatron.com</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260657</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260657</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:08:02 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Vinyl is great regardless of the recording method for two primary reasons.  When DJing, it allows you the maximum control of your music as well as building your sense of timing and DJ fundamentals.  Also, no DRM or other copy protection on vinyl.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>NSH</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260656</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260656</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:05:52 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Pylbug you&apos;re wrong about vinyl it does sound better.  I am a vinyl DJ and there is no comparison to sound quality from a cd and vinyl.  It sounds warm and alive, vs (C)old and (D)igital.  (and Don&apos;t even get me started on mp3&apos;s)
I can&apos;t tell you how many times other djs have approached my booth and commented on the superb sound quality.  And if you think its easier to mix a cd than it is to mix vinyl you obviously have never actually done it.  Only in vinyl can you automatically find your breaks without even having to listen to the recording.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>s</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260655</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260655</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:00:45 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I think vinyl is great because it forces the ADD afflicted among us to actually have patience and listen to a whole record... at least it does that for me.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>pylbug</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260651</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260651</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:51:20 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I think most people can&apos;t hear the difference, or attribute the sound of dirty, degraded vinyl (and their phono jack&apos;s low-end boost) to &quot;warmth&quot;.  Vinyl is analogue; the more you play it, the worse it sounds.  Most music released in the past fifteen years has been produced and recorded digitally, so that &quot;hip&quot; vinyl pressing is of no better quality than the CD pressing.  Vinyl lives because so many people want to be DJs, and think they need turntables to do so.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>NSH</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260649</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260649</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:44:42 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I love the smell of a record shop.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mr. Smith</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260647</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260647</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:30:23 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Is that Reckless on Broadway?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Dave!</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260645</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/03/23/focus_on_vinyl.php#comment-260645</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:22:23 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Vinyl lives... and at the center of the photo are Neil Diamond and Barry Manilow. Yep. Awesome.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
