<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: More Dead Animals Than the LP Zoo!</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/04/04/more_dead_animals_than_the_lp_zoo.php</link>
<description>All comments for More Dead Animals Than the LP Zoo!</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>PTKindz</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/04/04/more_dead_animals_than_the_lp_zoo.php#comment-261857</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/04/04/more_dead_animals_than_the_lp_zoo.php#comment-261857</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 09:02:33 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Have any of the tests come back confirming poison?
-PT&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>yeah we need more humans</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/04/04/more_dead_animals_than_the_lp_zoo.php#comment-261283</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/04/04/more_dead_animals_than_the_lp_zoo.php#comment-261283</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 13:32:41 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe if people would stop having more children than they or their land can support, this wouldn&apos;t even be a question. Until socially backwards people finally accept that family planning is in everyone&apos;s best interests, it&apos;s kind of hard not to laugh at those who advocate just allowing the current paradigm to continue. Of course laughing at these ideas doesn&apos;t make them any less irresponsible.

This isn&apos;t to say I think we should kill those already born or allow them to die due to neglect. It&apos;s just saying that while we fight to better the odds for those here now to thrive, we actively work to ensure that another generation isn&apos;t born into the same hopeless circumstances. 

Guarding native ecosystems and the creatures that are part of them is a fundamental part of protecting the future of every human who lives today and those who will live tomorrow too. People spreading like locusts to cover every last square inch of this planet will guarantee severe blowback by mother nature, and probably sooner rather than later.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>yeah we need more humans</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/04/04/more_dead_animals_than_the_lp_zoo.php#comment-261282</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/04/04/more_dead_animals_than_the_lp_zoo.php#comment-261282</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 13:32:14 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe if people would stop having more children than they or their land can support, this wouldn&apos;t even be a question. Until socially backwards people finally accept that family planning is in everyone&apos;s best interests, it&apos;s kind of hard not to laugh at those who advocate just allowing the current paradigm to continue. Of course laughing at these ideas doesn&apos;t make them any more irresponsible.

This isn&apos;t to say I think we should kill those already born or allow them to die due to neglect. It&apos;s just saying that while we fight to better the odds for those here now to thrive, we actively work to ensure that another generation isn&apos;t born into the same hopeless circumstances. 

Guarding native ecosystems and the creatures that are part of them is a fundamental part of protecting the future of every human who lives today and those who will live tomorrow too. People spreading like locusts to cover every last square inch of this planet will guarantee severe blowback by mother nature, and probably sooner rather than later.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>a</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/04/04/more_dead_animals_than_the_lp_zoo.php#comment-261272</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/04/04/more_dead_animals_than_the_lp_zoo.php#comment-261272</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:15:11 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So, Anonymous, what do you propose to do with all the Africans (i.e. people)?  Forced emigration?  Genocide? 

Gotta make sure that those animals prosper in their natural habitat--meaning we can&apos;t have people eating them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Anonymous</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/04/04/more_dead_animals_than_the_lp_zoo.php#comment-261270</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/04/04/more_dead_animals_than_the_lp_zoo.php#comment-261270</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 10:39:17 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;hahaha, nice funny at the end of the article. To bad wild animals are not Ok. 50% of the world species will be gone in the next 100 years, if not faster. Pretty much everything that is too large to adapt or migrate. Atleast we keep all the animals stolen from Africa here in our &apos;Natural Wildlife Parks.&apos;

I am so happy that my childeren will get to see African animals here in the US. It is so educational to see a Rhino in a cage, you can tell how meaninful it is to child development by how smart american childeren are.

Who would want to protect all the animals in their natural habital, letting their populations to prosper in the wild? Pfft, I would rather my kids go to the Zoo than let all your snot noze decentants live on a planet with wildlife.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
