<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Cafe Bionda:  A Hot New Blond in the South Loop</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/14/cafe_bionda_a_hot_new_blond_in_the_south_loop.php</link>
<description>All comments for Cafe Bionda:  A Hot New Blond in the South Loop</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 azhough</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:40:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>azhough@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>azhough@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>jk</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/14/cafe_bionda_a_hot_new_blond_in_the_south_loop.php#comment-437694</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/14/cafe_bionda_a_hot_new_blond_in_the_south_loop.php#comment-437694</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:47:03 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Chicago Magazine&apos;s &quot;Dish&quot; newsletter says:

Bionda Reef, the café next door to Cafe Bionda (1924 S. State St.; 312-326-9800), is scheduled to open in the first week of November; expect Sicilian pizza, Italian sandwiches, and an oyster bar.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>B News</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/14/cafe_bionda_a_hot_new_blond_in_the_south_loop.php#comment-272370</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/14/cafe_bionda_a_hot_new_blond_in_the_south_loop.php#comment-272370</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 02:00:02 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Cheers Chuck, we thought you&apos;d like this joint. Joe really did a nice job with this place. 

PS- Bridgeport has even been called South Loop. i.e. The South Loop Chamber of Commerce is at 3600 S. Halsted. Why does everyone question Chuck&apos;s map reading ability? Aren&apos;t these food reviews?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>rob</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/14/cafe_bionda_a_hot_new_blond_in_the_south_loop.php#comment-271946</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/14/cafe_bionda_a_hot_new_blond_in_the_south_loop.php#comment-271946</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:58:19 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Jeff: 
right on! as a resident, i prefer &apos;near south side&apos;.  Nothing south of roosevelt should be called &apos;south loop&apos;.  These bleeding and creeping of neighborhood  lines makes me pretty angry, especially when its done just to make a buck. 

Back on topic, maybe we went there while they were working out the kinks, or we ordered the wrong things, but our dishes were fairly bland and uninspired -- nothing at all like rosebud.  Our service was nice but a little on the creepy side.  

It&apos;s nice to see another restaurant in the near south side, but I don&apos;t think I&apos;ll be heading back too soon -- not with all the delicous options in chinatown just around the corner.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Chuck</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/14/cafe_bionda_a_hot_new_blond_in_the_south_loop.php#comment-271826</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/14/cafe_bionda_a_hot_new_blond_in_the_south_loop.php#comment-271826</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:30:04 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Jeff:  The restaurant is actually closer to Chinatown, Auto Row and the Historic Prairie District than the actual south Loop.  I put it in the South Loop for a semblance of proximity. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jeff</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/14/cafe_bionda_a_hot_new_blond_in_the_south_loop.php#comment-271810</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/14/cafe_bionda_a_hot_new_blond_in_the_south_loop.php#comment-271810</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:09:32 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this review, I may check it out.

This is not a complaint over this article, or Chicagoist, but isn&apos;t there a better desciption of the neighborhood than the South Loop? Yes, it&apos;s south of the Loop, but 1900 south is as far south as Armitage is north(almost)! Would someone even sort of consider Armitage to be &apos;North Loop&apos;?

It seems to me this is a term invented by real estate people trying to sell condos to wealthy white people who might be hesitant to live in a neighborhood more accurately named.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
