<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: The Results!</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/31/the_results.php</link>
<description>All comments for The Results!</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>martha</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/31/the_results.php#comment-286028</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/31/the_results.php#comment-286028</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 12:49:16 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It´s actually critically acclaimed. The Washington Post called it brilliant, The New York Times called it darkly captivating, etc., and I doubt any of those critics were hanging around Belmont back in the 80´s.  Everyone has different tastes, but I don´t think it´s a bad thing that so many people have a personal affection for this book and found it fun to read.   &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Thad</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/31/the_results.php#comment-283081</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/31/the_results.php#comment-283081</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:57:41 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Stupid question: So much praise I&apos;ve heard over the years for this book has to do with nostalgia for the old punk scence.

How much does nostalgia factor into your tastes in art and literatuure? (I realize this post is old, therefore probably won&apos;t get seen by many, but I&apos;d thought I&apos;d ask.)

Disclosure: While the book is well written and most entertaining, I don&apos;t really think &quot;American Skin&quot; is a great book by any means. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>james</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/31/the_results.php#comment-283044</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/31/the_results.php#comment-283044</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:15:52 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;so, do i get a prize? huh, huh, do i?
[i&apos;d settle for a beer, though ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>doggo</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/31/the_results.php#comment-283007</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/31/the_results.php#comment-283007</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 13:37:15 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This is a great book if you were part of the hardcore scene back in the 80s. It&apos;ll make ya cry with nostalgia. You may have to shave your head just for old times sake.

But beside the notalgia appeal, this is a great read too. Degrazia&apos;s a great writer.

So crank up some Naked Raygun, lace up yer books, pop open an Old Style and get into it!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>doggo</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/31/the_results.php#comment-283005</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/31/the_results.php#comment-283005</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 13:35:34 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This is a great book if you were part of the hardcore scene back in the 80s. It&apos;ll make ya cry with nostalgia. You may have to shave your head just for old times sake.

But beside the notalgia appeal, this is a great read too. Degrazia&apos;s a great writer.

So crank up some Naked Raygun, lace up yer books, pop open an Old Style and get into it!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Margaret</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/31/the_results.php#comment-282285</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/31/the_results.php#comment-282285</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:27:22 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;A book doesn&apos;t have to be the deepest thing ever to be a good book right?

I&apos;m looking forward to it and will read it with an open mind.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>james</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/31/the_results.php#comment-282194</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/07/31/the_results.php#comment-282194</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:56:13 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i am so honored with the shout out. literary snobs [the same sorts who are prone to worship of royko without ever having met the guy] may smirk and sniff, but it&apos;s a great read, especially for summer. and the author is a writing teacher at columbia if that counts for anything. just try to resist the &apos;i coulda written this&apos; thoughts, because well, you [and i] didn&apos;t and degrazia did. it&apos;s especially fun if you were part of that scene, trying to decipher who the actual people were who he fictionalizes. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
