http://chicagoist.com/2006/08/15/extra_extra.php All comments for Extra, Extra en-us 2009 Marcus Gilmer Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss marcusisabadass@gmail.com marcusisabadass@gmail.com 60 http://chicagoist.com/2006/08/15/extra_extra.php#comment-297842 http://chicagoist.com/2006/08/15/extra_extra.php#comment-297842 Comments Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:29:48 -0600 <p>@ james: see exhibit a - cellular field. i rest my case. :D</p> http://chicagoist.com/2006/08/15/extra_extra.php#comment-297632 http://chicagoist.com/2006/08/15/extra_extra.php#comment-297632 Comments Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:31:12 -0600 <p>Does everything in this city have to be turned into a theme park like experience? Is it no longer enough for people just to be able to look out the top of the sears tower and marvel at everything they can see without assistance and a song and dance? </p> http://chicagoist.com/2006/08/15/extra_extra.php#comment-297552 http://chicagoist.com/2006/08/15/extra_extra.php#comment-297552 Comments Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:26:14 -0600 <p>Hey, you guys missed a great story of Chicago Tribune hypocracy. They have a story on the website about the FCC investigating television stations who use corporate-produced commericals in their news segments without indicating their source. They put the segment in their regular news broadcast and the viewers don't realize its essentially a commercial. http://www.chicagotribune.com/technology/sns-ap-fcc-fake-news,1,4287657.story?coll=chi-news-hed The interesting ommission in their story is the fact that Tribune-owned WGN is the only Chicago station being investiaged for engaging in this dishonest practice! Dishonesty piled upon dishonesty!</p> http://chicagoist.com/2006/08/15/extra_extra.php#comment-297253 http://chicagoist.com/2006/08/15/extra_extra.php#comment-297253 Comments Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:00:50 -0600 <p>block 37? usable by 2008? that poor cursèd plot o' land? yeah, right.</p>