
Chicagoist went out on a limb this weekend and tried making a dish we were not familiar with. This dish, in case the title isn't clear enough, was Coq Au Vin. Coq Au Vin is, really, chicken stew with a fancy French name to scare off amateur cooks. In our preparations we checked out the ideas and methods of The Joy of Cooking, How To Cook Everything, this article and our mother. Between all these sources, we made a lovely dish, full of tender (oh so very tender) chicken just dripping with flavor. Now, before we even list the first ingredient, we know that many of you gourmet types will find many faults with this recipe. Though we're prepared for snooty tongue lashings, we're going attempt to cut all that off by acknowledging that there are a few key aspects of this recipe that are decidedly not the way of a classical Coq Au Vin. We'll try, as we go along, to highlight where we took a different path but the fact remains, classical or not, this stew was damn good ... and isn't that all that matters, really?
Coq Au Vin takes a good amount of time to make, so we suggest that you do it when you have a full day free and, perhaps, a house or apartment that needs a good cleaning. This recipe will easily feed four people and leave you lunch or dinner leftovers for the week. One of our first, large, digressions from a more traditional Coq Au Vin was our choice of meat. Ideally you should have a mature bird to work with (originally the dish was prepared with a worn out rooster) but we didn't have the time or the knowlege of where to get such a bird, so we went with a roasting or broiler chicken instead ... if any of you have suggestions on where to get an older bird, please let us know!
What You Need
1 Broiler or Roasting Chicken
1 white onion (roughly chopped)
6 carrots (peeled and chopped into 1-2 inch pieces)
1/4 cup chopped celeriac (we're not a big fan of celery proper, but if you are- that would work too)
3-4 tablespoons thyme (fresh thyme would be good too)
4-5 strips thick bacon (here is a big difference between classical coq au vin and this recipe ... all the recipes strongly suggested pancetta cut into pieces slightly thicker than a matchstick or unsmoked bacon ... we used thick cut, hickory smoked bacon)
1 cup pearl onions halved or quartered (we did a mix of both)
1 cup mushrooms halved or quartered (we used shitake mushrooms, but porcinis were recommended by some and more standard mushrooms by others ... this is really up to you)
1 cup mild green olives (also not a traditional aspect of the dish)
1 tablespoon olive oil
3 garlic cloves slightly crushed with flat side of knife
2-3 bay leaves
2-6 tablespoons flour
1 bottle Burgundy or Beaujolais wine (we used Georges Duboeuf Beaujolais-Villages, found at Trader Joes. In a number of our sources we were instructed to use the best wine we could afford, we're not sure we really did this as our bottle cost $6.99, but the results were not disappointing)
salt and pepper to taste
What You Do
1. First off you must take apart your chicken. Our method was a bit haphazard compared to some, but the basic jist is to separate the wings, thighs and breasts from the body of the chicken. You will need a strong, serrated knife in order to do this without bodily harm.
2. Once you've gotten your chicken into pieces, put the carcass into a pot of water and bring to boil. This step isn't entirely necessary, but it does allow you to get get any additional meat you may have left on the bird, off. It also will produce a very lovely and potent chicken stock you can use both in this dish and for later endeavors.
3. Put your chicken pieces, the white onion, the chopped carrots, 1 bayleaf, 2 tablespoons thyme and a smattering of the celeriac into a large stock pot and cover with water. Don't drown your chicken, you need enough water that all the pieces are immersed but not floating willy nilly, every which way. (This is another rather large difference between our recipe and those we researched. Most would say to brown the chicken in a skillet or dutch oven, perhaps even flouring them slightly ... we chose to pseudo poach the chicken because, well, because our mother told us to.) 
4. Bring the water to a boil for five minutes then down to a simmer for one and a half to two hours (this is where the housecleaning comes in). Every once and a while you should check to make sure the chicken is still covered by the water ... it should be, but if it's not add enough water that the chicken is, once again, covered.
5. Check your carcass pot. When the meat is cooked and the water is chock full of chickeny goodness, remove the pot from heat. Remove the carcass from the broth. You can do this by having another pot and a colander on hand (they will be useful later on as well). Have the colander rest securely in the extra pot and slowly pour the carcass and broth into it. Put the broth to the side and allow the carcass to cool. Once the carcass is cool (and your hands are washed) pick all additional meat off the bones and throw it on in with the simmering chicken pieces.
6. Once your one and half to two hours are up, use the colander pot setup again, to separate the stock from the chicken pieces and vegetables. Set the stock aside and wait for the meat to be cool enough to touch. 
Once the meat is touchable, remove and discard the skin and bones. Then separate the meat from the vegetables and break apart the larger pieces of chicken into bite sized chunks and nibbles. Shred some of it more finely, if you like.
7. Next, in a Dutch oven (or some similarly voluminous cooking pot) fry up the pieces of bacon until most, if not all, of their fat is rendered. In other words, fry the bacon until extremely crispy.
8. Take out and put aside the bacon. Turn the burner heat down to medium/medium low and then add the onions and garlic to the mix. Sautee them for three or four minutes.
9. Once the garlic and onions have softened, but have not browned, add the chicken and one tablespoon of olive oil. Stir.
10. Add one cup of the reserved stock, the remaining thyme, celeriac and bay leaf. Stir.
11. Add 3/4 of the bottle of wine (we actually put the whole bottle in, but then had to futz a little bit with the chicken stock to wine ratio, we think this will work better ... you could definitely add even less of the bottle to start with and then experiment to your taste). Stir.
12. Add the mushrooms and olives. Stir.
13. Add two tablespoons of flour and mix completely. If you feel that the stew is still not as thick as you would like, continue to add one tablespoon of flour at a time until it is (because of our wine to chicken stock problem, as well as our affinity for a really thick stew, we ended up adding 5 tablespoons of flour but this may not be necessary or wanted in your case).
14. Let the whole mess simmer for ten to fifteen minutes then it's ready for belly consumption.

A hearty stew deserves a hearty companion, use wide egg noodles, boiled new potatoes or rice to soak up this dish.

Weekend Diversion: Night Of The Ponies


Maybe my monitor is off but that color doesn't look too appetizing to me...
Louis Jadot makes a better Beaujolais-Villages for about two more dollars.
When cooking with wine go with what tastes good to you. Cooking the wine will reduce it and enhance the flavors, making them stronger. If you're looking for a good wine that's not so pricey but still great, check out the Côtes du Rhône or any of the Beaujolais Cru's that have fancy names. A good Pinot Noir from the region would be great, also.
My monitor isn't off. It looks gross and dead. I thought the picture was a joke at first. Photoshop a little yum into that pic.
Rich, to get a really good pic of food you need a "food stylist". For some reason, even the most beautiful food looks gross when done by an amateur. You should have seen the pic of mac and cheese a couple of years ago. YUK!
The reason your dish turned out a sickly mauve color is that you didn't brown the chicken. Why did you skip this step? I would say it is probably the single most important thing you could do when making this. Browning the chicken before adding the liquid is what gives this dish most of it's flavor!
Really, you went through some unnecessarily complex steps, and didn't brown the chicken? Ridiculous.
Here's an off the top of my head version, which though also not 100% authentic, is guaranteed to taste, and definitely look better.
Brown a bunch of chicken in some oil, and throw in a strip of bacon while this happens if you want. When the pieces of chicken are thouroughly browned, dump in some water (or chicken stock - even canned is fine) and some red wine, just until the chicken is covered. Add some garlic (3 whole cloves) some cut up carrot pieces, and some onions (you can brown the onions a bit before you add them if you want). Add some dried thyme and a bay leaf. Cook this covered on low heat (simmer) for 45 minutes. Open the pot and taste it. Add salt as necessary, let it cook a bit uncovered if it's too thin and watery looking.
If you want to get fancy, add some chopped fresh parsley at this point. You can add a squeeze of lemon, or another dash of red wine if it tates oily. If you want to keep getting fancy, you can take out the chicken pieces at this stage, take all the meat off and discard the bones and skin.
This will have a nice mahogany-red/brown color, and will actually taste like a rich stew with flavors from the browned bits the chicken left from the ESSENTIAL STEP of initial browning.
I'm glad it tasted good - but as soon as you boiled the chicken it was never going to taste anything like Coq Au Vin. It's not a matter of "classic" style or not, it is the taste of it.
Jeff is right, the chicken and vegetables need to be browned and simmered in a wine/stock mixture. Boiling the chicken takes out a lot of the chicken flavor (it's left in the stock you've made). Boiling it also added water to the sauce so you had to add flour, it tastes a lot better if it's just a reduction sauce.
Oh my. I knew I'd get in trouble for not browning, but I didn't realize that I'd get in trouble for how it looked. Bad appearance noted. Thanks for all the suggestions.
Mmmm. Chicken a la Squid Ink.
whoa...that looks really bad, I agree with the color being off b/c the chicken looks purple to me. YIKEs!
I have to agree with the other comments that the photo looks really, um, not good.
If you want a good coq au vin recipe, get Julia Child's classic "Mastering the Art of French Cooking, vol. I." It's not really very complicated, and she explains all the steps quite well. (I would offer two small simplifications - she says to boil the bacon to remove the smokiness of American bacon. These days pancetta is easier to find and lets you skip the boiling. Also she says to add some cognac at one point and flame it off - I did that and scared the hell out of myself. I've since been told by better cooks than I that the flaming is unnecessary, you can just let it boil off.)
Caroline,
Thank you for posting this. I have always wanted to try this dish. Although some of the comments are helpful, I picture a bunch of angry Star Trek type dorks, like star fleet ensign Jeff, behind the vitriolic slamming of your cooking. It brings a smile to my face. Thank you. Keep the good work!
Coq Au Vin isn't a stew. The only thing the recipe calls for as far as a stew is the chicken is "stewed" in the marinade that you soaked the chicken in. The liquid that is in the pan becomes a pan sauce after the chicken is cooked through. You can add Noodles as an accompaniment but it's not part of the main dish.
Generally when plating this dish you'd place the chicken on the plate along with any side dishes you want. Then drizzle the pan sauce over the chicken.