<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Extra, Extra</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/11/27/extra_extra.php</link>
<description>All comments for Extra, Extra</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 07:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>e</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/11/27/extra_extra.php#comment-745486</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/11/27/extra_extra.php#comment-745486</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:30:57 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;But, bottom-scoring schools also had far more poverty -- in all but one case more than the CPS average of 85 percent low-income kids -- and researchers have long found that poverty creates a powerful drag on achievement. A Sun-Times analysis indicated CPS school poverty levels were six times more likely to predict third-grade reading scores than third-grade class size. . . Chicago&apos;s high-scoring schools prove larger classes -- at least for more-affluent kids -- can work.&quot;

this seems like a pretty silly study.  so rich kids are still ok with big classes.  yay!  they&apos;ll always be fine, their parents can make up for it at home.  the sun-times is spending 2 days talking about how perfectly financially-stable white kids are doing ok?  this is news?

but i also like erik&apos;s theory.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>burrr....</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/11/27/extra_extra.php#comment-744243</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/11/27/extra_extra.php#comment-744243</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:41:50 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Model UN can get nasty. I blame Syria.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Erik</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/11/27/extra_extra.php#comment-744195</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/11/27/extra_extra.php#comment-744195</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:14:01 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Call my cynical, but I&apos;d say higher test scores coming from larger classes means more cheating, as monitoring all those rug rats would be much harder to do. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>geekgrrl</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2006/11/27/extra_extra.php#comment-744064</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2006/11/27/extra_extra.php#comment-744064</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 07:04:30 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Does anybody know what awaits Liz Armstrong in Vegas?

i&apos;m guessing many veneral diseases in a row, each more ravaging than the last.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
