<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Two Races We&apos;re Watching</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php</link>
<description>All comments for Two Races We&apos;re Watching</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>russ99</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-1018970</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-1018970</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:37:38 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the 32nd ward went downhill when Matlak moved his headquarters out of the old Bucktown neighborhood location into the industrial area between the river and the Kennedy.

That way when the condo developers came by to get his &quot;blessing&quot; they didn&apos;t even need to drive through the neighborhood they were destroying.

Don&apos;t cound out Catherine Zaryczny (the other candidate in the 32nd ward race) since she&apos;s even more anti-developer than Scott Waguespack and represents the ethnic people (that remain, sadly) who have lived in the area for over 10 years...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>civil</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-1016754</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-1016754</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:42:02 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This is going to be one exciting election night. Both the Tribune and Sun-Times just endorsed Naisy Dolar; but Brewer has the CFL.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>firecat</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-999034</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-999034</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:37:46 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Dolar got DL21C and Citizen Action endorsed them both.  This is far from over.

Dolar raised almost 60K, Aftab a little over 20K.  Stone&apos;s got bank.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>firecat</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-999015</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-999015</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 22:51:25 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;no wonder seiu didn&apos;t back brewer.  no one wants to back a candidate that can&apos;t even fundraise.  His D2s show he can&apos;t raise money (only $10K in the last filing period)!  Even Aftab raised more than him!

85K loan means no more money for a run-off.  no wonder seiu is waiting to see.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>firecat</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-994455</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-994455</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:15:16 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;SEIU is staying out.  Dolar got FOP and is poised to get IVI-IPO.  Again I say, let&apos;s wait and see.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Anonymous</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-994452</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-994452</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:07:09 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Stone&apos;s cronies go from store to store coercing store owners to give money to Bernie&apos;s campaign and put up signs. If they don&apos;t do it, building inspectors will show up to close down the place.

Signs don&apos;t mean nothin&apos;.

Bernie is corrupt and victimizes people. He&apos;s and old, senile, nasty (did I say OLD?), crusty fogie who&apos;s got to go! If he&apos;s elected he&apos;s just going to have that batshit crazy bitch daughter of his appointed in his place.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Da Blogger</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-993994</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-993994</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:37:54 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Last night I walked down to Devn street for a bite to eat. I hadn&apos;t been there in sometime; so it came to my big surprise that the majority of Indian stores had Stone/Daley posters up in their windows. There were a few Aftab posters. I think I may had seen one Dolar poster. But none for Brewer. This is making me think of a few things:

Stone&apos;s popularity among the Indo/Pak residence and businesses of the 50th has been greatly underestimated. 

-OR-

Brewer&apos;s campaign is not targeting the Asian demographic in the 50th.

-OR-

Most of the businesses on Devon aren&apos;t much concerned about the election and most likely can&apos;t vote anyways because they&apos;re not eligible. 

-OR-

Stone has promised them special favors.

As much as I don&apos;t want to forecast this election, I would have to give the Asian vote swing to Stone. At least he&apos;s working to get their approval--and that&apos;re more than I can say about Brewer or Dolar. True, posting a sign to endorse a candidate or incumbent may not be a validation that a group of people will be voting any specific way. But it sure presents a lot of appeal. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Bobby B</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-993423</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-993423</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:30:13 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Too close to call ?! From what I understand Brewer has most of the endorsements for the candidates and he also has the CFL. And you know he&apos;s going to get SEIU.

I think this is a race between Stone and Brewer. God bless Brewer. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>firecat</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-993236</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-993236</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 23:22:58 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i&apos;d say wait and see.  let&apos;s see what other endorsements come down the pike, its too close to call at this point.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Bobby B</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-993043</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-993043</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:58:31 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So what&apos;s your point Firecat ? Are you saying its anyone&apos;s race ?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Bobby B</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-993042</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-993042</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:57:30 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So what&apos;s your point Firecat? Are you saying that its anyone&apos;s race at the moment?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>firecat</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-990365</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-990365</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:42:44 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;cfl endorsement won&apos;t go far in 50.  plus, where is the proof of this manpower or money?  labor troops have already hit cardenas and natarus&apos; wards, but no sign of the help in 50.  seems like an empty endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jenna672</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-989994</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-989994</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:23:23 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Bobby, you&apos;ve got your story straight. Brewer already had a strong campaign and was the frontrunner. Now, with the CFL&apos;s financial, strategic, and manpower help, Brewer is far and away the favorite to beat Stone. 

Naisy Dolar and Salman Aftab are fringe candidates and not serious.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Bobby B</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-984466</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-984466</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:54:05 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m curious to know if there are any early predictions for the race in the 50th. Through my grapevine sources, I&apos;ve heard that Brewer is pretty close in strength and can matchup to Stone&apos;s campaign if it comes down to the wire. Naisy Dolar is a distant second. And Sal Aftab is not even in the race.

Is there news that speaks differently ? Do tell. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Bobby B</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-984458</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-984458</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:48:20 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m curious to know if there were some early predictions for the 50th. Last I heard Brewer was standing as the candidate most likely to knock-off Stone. Naisy was a distant second. And Sal Aftab was not even in the running. Any news that speaks differently ?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>JP Paulus</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-984246</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-984246</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:44:42 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Bloggy, you got it right.

But they make a big noise, and can push people AWAY from their desired candidate.

The 46th ward blogs are a new extenstion of the anti-Shiller hate, as shown in this  Anti-Shiller bookmark from last election.

A few anonymous people have this strong urge to be so negative, but i think it really turns off people n the middle, who could vote for EITHER side.  But these anonymous haters just give off an image that most people who support the opposing candidate are like that.

It also doesn&apos;t make sense why they stay in their neighborhood if they hate it so much.  When i read their blogs, i rarely (if ever) find anything they actually LIKE about their neighborhood.  They make it seem like Engelewood or Lawndale!  

 If the incumbent wins the election, those negative bloggers, if they don&apos;t want to continue in self-destructive hate &amp; pain, need to move out where they can be happy (i wonder what place would they consider ideal? They never mention that...) &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Bloggy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-983612</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-983612</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:49:24 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s really interesting to see the blog coverage of these races.  Both 46 and 49 seem to have a cadre of anti-incumbent bloggers who vorifciously post reduclious rants and accusations.  All of the opponents in 50 seem to have a pretty active on-line presence, but as someone who has to commute through the 50th, you really see a lot more signs for the incumbent, and you might see a few Aftab signs, but barely any Brewer or Dolar signs.  My guess is the bloggers probably represent a very small, but very vocal disgruntled segment of a ward&apos;s population.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jk</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-983015</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-983015</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:28:55 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. Naisy continues to stay solid and strong.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>CW</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-982714</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-982714</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:38:53 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;From my observation, Naisy continues to mount a strong campaign and challenge to Stone.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>The 'Broken Heart' of Rogers Park</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-973740</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-973740</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:54:23 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Kevin,

Glad to see 49 has caught the eye of The Chicagoist. We too feel this should be a exciting election season. I&apos;m glad to help be your eyes and ears.

As for those accusations you claim. In three years, I haven&apos;t been served with one law-suit asking to retract any of my blogposts as false or slander.

As Alderman Moore is so fond of saying, I&apos;ll stand on my record.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>The 'Broken Heart' of Rogers Park</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-973743</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-973743</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:54:15 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Kevin,

Glad to see 49 has caught the eye of The Chicagoist. We too feel this should be a exciting election season. I&apos;m glad to help be your eyes and ears.

As for those accusations you claim. In three years, I haven&apos;t been served with one law-suit asking to retract any of my blogposts as false or slander.

As Alderman Moore is so fond of saying, I&apos;ll stand on my record.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Kevin</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-973359</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-973359</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:15:40 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;vit, agreed. But isn&apos;t the 32nd ward already destroyed? At least by the standards of the people that want to &quot;save&quot; it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>vit</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-972880</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/01/18/two_races_were_watching.php#comment-972880</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:29:50 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Matlak need to go.  That guy is a disaster and seems hell-bent on destroying the 32nd ward.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>