<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Chicago Cubans?  Mark Says No</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/03/01/chicago_cubans_mark_says_no.php</link>
<description>All comments for Chicago Cubans?  Mark Says No</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:45:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>mts</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/03/01/chicago_cubans_mark_says_no.php#comment-1024884</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/03/01/chicago_cubans_mark_says_no.php#comment-1024884</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:35:53 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes says the Cubs are worth $448?  Time to sell the stereo and scrounge between the couch cushions - oh, $448 million.  I wonder why he&apos;d make an offer that&apos;s drastically above supposed market value like that.  The Trib you&apos;d think would be desperate to sell to shore up their floundering empire - low balling motivated sellers, especially if the buyer (Cuban) is in no rush to buy, makes more sense.  $625m makes no sense, especially now they&apos;re not a winning team - yet.

What made the Cubs a national brand was being on WGN when it became a super station.  Take them from easy view and wide exposure, and you stop selling Cubbie stuff in non Chicago places, I&apos;d think.  I used to love hockey as a little kid (the Hawks on WGN, the weekend national games on NBC), but once hockey disappeared off of free TV, I forgot about the game.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Josh Miller</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/03/01/chicago_cubans_mark_says_no.php#comment-1024777</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/03/01/chicago_cubans_mark_says_no.php#comment-1024777</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:58:09 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, part of what gives the Cubs such market value is their broad exposure on WGN. By popularity, they&apos;re ranked as third most-liked team in the country.

It&apos;d still be a great financial move for Mark to take over the Cubs franchise, but disastrous to remove them from easy exposure.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jeff C.</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/03/01/chicago_cubans_mark_says_no.php#comment-1024470</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/03/01/chicago_cubans_mark_says_no.php#comment-1024470</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:47:04 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;A little more compelling content than NHL hockey
What&apos;s your beef with hockey? The Blackhawks are one thing, but a blanket statement about the game?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>