<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Face-to-Face With the &quot;Check, Please&quot; Effect</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/02/facetoface_with_the_check_please_effect.php</link>
<description>All comments for Face-to-Face With the &quot;Check, Please&quot; Effect</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>chuck</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/02/facetoface_with_the_check_please_effect.php#comment-1059884</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/02/facetoface_with_the_check_please_effect.php#comment-1059884</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:50:09 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Amanda Puck hasn&apos;t hosted the show in years. 

Kidding.  Alpana&apos;s Reader cover from last year still makes me drool.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ted</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/02/facetoface_with_the_check_please_effect.php#comment-1059618</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/02/facetoface_with_the_check_please_effect.php#comment-1059618</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:27:12 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i think the show&apos;s success is mostly due to the beautiful and talented host. she is the glue that holds it all together.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>chuck</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/02/facetoface_with_the_check_please_effect.php#comment-1059096</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/02/facetoface_with_the_check_please_effect.php#comment-1059096</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:35:19 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m not sure about how long the surge will last, but if this is indicative of a repeat airing, I&apos;m glad I didn&apos;t go when it was a new episode.

Typically, I tend to catch episodes of &quot;Check, Please&quot; whenever a crusty retired lawyer is arguing with a male model over the merits of fire.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>CC1st</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/02/facetoface_with_the_check_please_effect.php#comment-1058853</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/02/facetoface_with_the_check_please_effect.php#comment-1058853</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:22:32 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually I remember seeing the episode a while ago, like at least a month or two ago, so I don&apos;t know - maybe the surge will last a while.  Or are people going based on the repeat episode?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Paul or the Giant Rabbit</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/02/facetoface_with_the_check_please_effect.php#comment-1058400</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/02/facetoface_with_the_check_please_effect.php#comment-1058400</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 11:16:36 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;They should have gone to La Fontanella in the first place. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
