<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Lawyerin&apos; Up</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php</link>
<description>All comments for Lawyerin&apos; Up</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Hajer</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1065367</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1065367</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:50:05 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;its time to take Matlaks out, its time now, get your friend out to vote, dont miss this chance, DONT.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>32t</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1063914</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1063914</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:58:01 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;ve stopped by Matlak&apos;s Monday night office hours 3 times in as many years.  5 break ins to our garage, 2 abandoned vehicles in front of the house.  Twice have new homes being built on Oakley resulted in our plants and flowers getting destroyed.  Check out all the Matlak propoganda on all the new construction and abandoned buildings that developers own!  Telling.  Get your friends out to vote for Scott!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>spook</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1059116</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1059116</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 12:04:43 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Can any one enlighten me as to why N.O.W.W. backed Fioretti in the First Place over the progressive Black civil rights lawyer who worked for Lisa Madigan and had the support of IVI- IPO and much much more importantly the progressive Howard Dean types still active in Chicago? I mean what&apos;s the deal or is N.O.W.W simply trying to add a the fifth letter to their name to further clarify their true mission, moving from the National Organization of White Women to the National Organization of Wealthy White Women?

Just curious is all&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>spook</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1059107</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1059107</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:51:33 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Can any one enlighten me as to why N.O.W.W. backed Fioretti in the First Place over the progressive Black civil rights lawyer who worked for Lisa Madigan and had the support of IVI- IPO and much much more importantly the progressive Howard Dean types still active in Chicago? I mean what&apos;s the deal or is N.O.W.W simply trying to add a the fifth letter to their name to further clarify their true mission, moving from the National Organization of White Women to the National Organization of Wealthy White Women?

Just curious is all&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Paul or the Giant Rabbit</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1059099</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1059099</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:38:18 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m not certain that the ABA maintains a comprehensive list of licensed attorneys. Waguespack does not have an Illinois law license (according to the ARDC website) for whatever difference that makes. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>vit r</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1059045</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1059045</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 10:39:35 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Love the Matlak video.  I lived in his ward for 3 years and he never once responded to an email for a phone call.  I now live around the corner in the 1st ward, so I still see his influence everywhere and I met him once coming off the &apos;el&apos;, I REALLY hope he loses.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Kerry in Bucktown</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1059003</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1059003</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 09:47:01 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Very cool video! I called Matlack&apos;s office FOUR times about a sinkhole in front of my apartment. Never got a call back. My boss knows someone in Streets &amp; San downtown. He called his friend for me. That&apos;s when it finally got fixed.  Bye-bye Matlack...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>AngrySicilian</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1058997</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1058997</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 09:38:10 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Fioretti&apos;s past is one thing... but Haithcock hasn&apos;t done jack squat for the 2nd ward.  I hope people realize that the 2nd ward needs an alderman who will work for the residents.. not miss meetings and ignore phone calls.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>dw</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1058974</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/03/lawyerin_up.php#comment-1058974</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 08:52:55 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The Matlak video rules!  If Ted loses, it will be because of those cinder-block monsters that he&apos;s upzoned all over the ward.  

What&apos;s particularly funny is that all of the worst giant construction projects have Matlak signs all over them -- there couldn&apos;t be a more obvious display of Ted&apos;s real constitutency:  big development.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>