<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Dammit, Roger, Get Those Lady Fliers!</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/16/dammit_roger_get_those_lady_fliers.php</link>
<description>All comments for Dammit, Roger, Get Those Lady Fliers!</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Kristina</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/16/dammit_roger_get_those_lady_fliers.php#comment-1068779</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/16/dammit_roger_get_those_lady_fliers.php#comment-1068779</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:46:33 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Agree with Bekki.  This website was a waste of money.  Is it really going to convince women to fly more or even to fly with AA when they do?  I doubt it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ferdy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/16/dammit_roger_get_those_lady_fliers.php#comment-1068546</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/16/dammit_roger_get_those_lady_fliers.php#comment-1068546</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:10:10 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I know a lot of women in other parts of the country that would love this kind of thing--like all the women who worship Oprah. You may not like it, but women still do the majority of child care and travelling with children. Elderly widows who are retired travel a lot with their girlfriends. This is smart marketing. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>thundercougarfalconbird</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/16/dammit_roger_get_those_lady_fliers.php#comment-1068259</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/16/dammit_roger_get_those_lady_fliers.php#comment-1068259</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:35:25 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Two Words for you, hn1:

&quot;Vanilla Sky&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>hn1</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/16/dammit_roger_get_those_lady_fliers.php#comment-1068183</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/16/dammit_roger_get_those_lady_fliers.php#comment-1068183</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:19:45 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;what an ass for a face you are!
the Cruise comment was disgusting.
Cruise is a GREAT actor,everyone knows that
You really suck bad. What a bitchy behavior, put your feeling aside idiot.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>K.</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/16/dammit_roger_get_those_lady_fliers.php#comment-1068132</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/16/dammit_roger_get_those_lady_fliers.php#comment-1068132</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:24:13 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I totally agree, Bekki.  I am perfectly capable of planning my own trips without AA telling me where I might want to go.  I am perfectly capable of choosing reading material, and as it happens, having two X chromosomes doesn&apos;t automatically make me want to read the Shopaholic series.  

It also doesn&apos;t make me want to watch made-for-television movies about women betrayed, various diseases of the week, or murderous sorority sister.  UGH, gross.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Bekki</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/16/dammit_roger_get_those_lady_fliers.php#comment-1068076</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/16/dammit_roger_get_those_lady_fliers.php#comment-1068076</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:30:08 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;As a woman, I think there&apos;s generally nothing worse than women-targeted media: Web sites, magazines, cable channels.  It&apos;s all the same stuff--how to look better, how to tell if your significant other is cheating on you, what they really mean when they say &quot;x&quot;.  It&apos;s all crap.  I am about more than my spouse, fashion and whether I groom appropriately.  

I don&apos;t really get why our travel needs are different than men&apos;s.  Would they have this on a men&apos;s-targeted site?  &quot;...pick up tips for a stylish and efficient travel wardrobe.&quot;  No, they wouldn&apos;t.

Treat me as an equal, for christ&apos;s sake.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jerry</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/16/dammit_roger_get_those_lady_fliers.php#comment-1068007</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/16/dammit_roger_get_those_lady_fliers.php#comment-1068007</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:20:27 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;wow, that website is incredibly condescending.  If I were a woman, I&apos;d be pissed.  

Doesn&apos;t it bother you that AA thinks so little of your intelligence that they think that you would be more likely to fly with them because of &quot;girlfriend getaways!&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>thundercougarfalconbird</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/16/dammit_roger_get_those_lady_fliers.php#comment-1067999</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/04/16/dammit_roger_get_those_lady_fliers.php#comment-1067999</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:12:47 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;...especially considering the fact that there aren&apos;t any airline websites targeting men&quot;

Someone never heard of &quot;Hooters Air&quot;. OK, it&apos;s defunct now, but still.

And since when is childcare and reading the domain of women?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
