<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Bulls Win Again</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/05/16/bulls_win_again.php</link>
<description>All comments for Bulls Win Again</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 07:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Cletus Warhol</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/05/16/bulls_win_again.php#comment-1093909</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/05/16/bulls_win_again.php#comment-1093909</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 15:14:23 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Since every veiled pseudoprediction I&apos;ve made on Chicagoist during this series has been wrong; I&apos;d like to take this opportunity to say that I suspect that the Pistons will bear down and close the series out in Chicago.

But you know I&apos;d love to see this go to seven. Go Bullies!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Justin</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/05/16/bulls_win_again.php#comment-1093871</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/05/16/bulls_win_again.php#comment-1093871</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 14:40:42 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m standing by my original prediction of Pistons in 6, but I wouldn&apos;t be totally shocked if the Bulls stole this series.  The better team doesn&apos;t always win in the playoffs-- see last year&apos;s Spurs (who lost to the Mavs) and Heat (who beat those same Mavs).

That&apos;s not to disrespect the Bulls. They got skills.  They&apos;re just not ready for the Finals yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>thundercougarfalconbird</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/05/16/bulls_win_again.php#comment-1093773</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/05/16/bulls_win_again.php#comment-1093773</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 13:13:50 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Man, they need a scorer, though. 

That said, I would love to hang in there and shock, of all teams, the Pistons.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>MC</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/05/16/bulls_win_again.php#comment-1093696</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/05/16/bulls_win_again.php#comment-1093696</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 11:43:02 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;emjoy is the new enjoy...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>MC</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/05/16/bulls_win_again.php#comment-1093693</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/05/16/bulls_win_again.php#comment-1093693</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 11:41:30 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I have to admit as angry as I was that they blew game 3 when it happened, I&apos;m even more pissed now.  If they hadn&apos;t relented the lead in that game, they would now be up 3-2 heading back to Chicago with a chance to close out the series.

That would have made me a happy guy.  That being said.  Don&apos;t give up on your Baby Bulls, they certainly have enough fight left in them, and the Pistons look lackadaisical lately, like they just expect the Bulls to lay down and die.

I&apos;ll emjoy this while it lasts.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>marty</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/05/16/bulls_win_again.php#comment-1093493</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/05/16/bulls_win_again.php#comment-1093493</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 07:52:59 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;To all the haters out there sure to comment with &quot;they&apos;ll blow it in game 7&quot; remarks, I urge you to enjoy this moment. Go Bulls!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>