Chicagoist: Cubs & White Sox Face Off in 2007

Abhay

Sat, 19 May 2007 20:52:33 -0600

This game is completely worthless. I will admit that I bought tickets solely for the reason that I can scalp them at an insane price to suckers.

thundercougarfalconbird

Sat, 19 May 2007 01:50:19 -0600

Is it just me or is this season really hard to get excited about? Neither Chicago team is really making noise, and around the league it's all just steroids, steroids, steroids... I'm counting down the days till I get to go home to Bourbonnais to watch Bears camp.

Johnny

Fri, 18 May 2007 20:01:19 -0600

exactly ping, if only the cub fans understood that, these days I just competly ignore them, it doesnt prove anything unless both are in world series together, then you have something to talk about whos the best team when one wins.

Julene

Fri, 18 May 2007 16:28:49 -0600

Cubs Win!!

Ping

Fri, 18 May 2007 14:28:43 -0600

Who cares. This annual battle has become boring. It's like debating who is hotter, Patty or Selma?

southside

Fri, 18 May 2007 13:46:25 -0600

Cuck the Fubs.

navin

Fri, 18 May 2007 12:55:22 -0600

GO SOX!

Jeremy

Fri, 18 May 2007 12:07:09 -0600

For Benjy, having one Cub on the team would be "heavy on the Cubbies."

Dave

Fri, 18 May 2007 12:00:06 -0600

There are actually more white sox than cubs on that list. How exactly is that a cubs/tribune bias? Also, they play six games over 162, not three.