By now it comes as no surprise to followers of politics that one of the most valuable assets in Senator Barack Obama's presidential campaign is his wife Michelle. Her demeanor, accessibility and professional pedigree are invaluable to her husband's aspirations. As the Senator's campaign has shifted into higher gear, Mrs. Obama has gradually trained her energies on helping her husband win the Democratic nomination next year. She's taken a leave of absence from her job as Vice President for Community and External Affairs for the University of Chicago Hospitals. But it was her resignation from the board of directors at Treehouse Foods yesterday that may help her husband further in the campaign.
The Westchester-based food services company includes among its clients Wal-Mart, which is Treehouse's largest customer for pickles and peppers. The press release announcing Mrs. Obama's resignation cited the "increased demands on her time." It's unspoken, but Treehouse's business relationship with Wal-Mart surely played a part in her decision. On the other side of the pond, Sen. Obama is already being branded a "hypocrite" for blasting Wal-Mart's hardline anti-union policies (if not is contribution to the decline of Western civilization), while his wife earned $51,200 in salary and 7,500 Treehouse stock options last year from one of Wal-Mart's biggest suppliers. It won't be long before conservative wingnuts and Obama's rivals for the Democratic nomination begin to use this information against him. One candidate who should hold her tongue is Senator Hillary Clinton, who once served on Wal-Mart's board of directors while her husband was Governor of Arkansas.
If only all those pesky ties between the Obamas and Tony Rezko could be tied up so neatly.



Oh geez. There is so _nothing_ there with Obama and Rezko. Even the press out for his blood have admitted that they have zero. It seems ridiculous to even refer to it as an actual news story.
I don't really understand why anything Michelle does can be construed as a conflict of interest for the Senator. They're not the same person.
cheryl said:
"I don't really understand why anything Michelle does can be construed as a conflict of interest for the Senator. They're not the same person."
Um, maybe because they are married? and they share the same home, same living expenses, perhaps some shared bank accounts/investments, etc? Maybe because they don't split expenses as if they were just roommates? How does their childrens' school expenses get paid? By a blind trust? No, by, i am assuming, their shared assets, which have come, at least partially, by way of the big and evil Wal-Mart, as well as a hospital that has not lived up to its mission to treat the underfunded.
I still think Obama is a better option than any of the republicans running, but for those who say 'this is so not a news story' and 'what does his wife have to do with him'? Would you really say the same if we were talking about Blagojevich or Giuliani or Romney, etc.? I didn't think so.