<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Essential Cinema: The Films of David Lynch</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/06/29/essential_cinem.php</link>
<description>All comments for Essential Cinema: The Films of David Lynch</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>unnamable</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/06/29/essential_cinem.php#comment-1137742</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/06/29/essential_cinem.php#comment-1137742</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:05:37 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Lynch&apos;s work operates in ways closer to visual art than to traditional narrative cinema. His movies most certainly have a meaning, but their meaning and power come from his ability to transmit his personal vision and his unparalleled mastery of creating moods through imagery and sound. Don&apos;t be distracted by the resonances with other narrative films which show up in his work, story is quasi-archetypal for Lynch. I agree with Rob: appreciating Lynch is not about &apos;getting&apos; it; rather, it is about something deeper, simpler, and I enjoy that particular ride. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ferdy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/06/29/essential_cinem.php#comment-1137421</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/06/29/essential_cinem.php#comment-1137421</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:39:08 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Who said movies have to be about meaning?! I have argued before that a traditional film lulls us with stories, gives us characters and situations that unfold for our psychological benefit and entertainment. However, a film doesn&apos;t have to do that. When it doesn&apos;t, it causes a lot of discomfort because then the viewer has to try to organize its images, sounds, and word to ocme back into psychological equilibrium. Lynch&apos;s works take people places at times, but often makes them finish the voyage on their own. The Straight Story semmed to be his attempt to see if he could make a traditional narrative. He could. Time to move on to the next thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>evelyn</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/06/29/essential_cinem.php#comment-1137375</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/06/29/essential_cinem.php#comment-1137375</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:54:38 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i will buy the &quot;pie&quot; analogy, but david lynch is making mincemeat-cicada pie.  he&apos;s not making it because he likes it, he&apos;s not making it because other people like it.  maybe some people will happen to like mincemeat-cicada pie.  to them david lynch would say &quot;that&apos;s cool.  i was just making it because i head a dream about mincemeat-cicada pie so i decided to make it.&quot;*

i&apos;m not trying to talk people out of liking david lynch films.  there&apos;s no point.  you support me here: if you like it, you like it.  if you don&apos;t, well, there&apos;s no reason to, because he&apos;s not saying anything.

*which is exactly why and how he made his short film, &quot;the alphabet.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Rob Christopher</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/06/29/essential_cinem.php#comment-1137320</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/06/29/essential_cinem.php#comment-1137320</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:55:08 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Evelyn: I&apos;m afraid that I couldn&apos;t disagree with you more. I think the problem people have is they try to understand his stuff intellectually, but the only way you can really &quot;understand&quot; a Lynch movie is by using intuitions and emotion. Same as with surrealism. It&apos;s like trying to &quot;understand&quot; what a slice of apple pie &quot;means.&quot; I dunno, it just tastes good.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>evelyn</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/06/29/essential_cinem.php#comment-1137307</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/06/29/essential_cinem.php#comment-1137307</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:41:52 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;There is no such thing as a dull Lynch movie&quot;

false: The Straight Story.

david lynch is brilliant not because he makes brilliant movies, but because he is playing a huge joke on EVERYONE.  his movies don&apos;t mean anything.  if you find meaning in them, it was an accident.  the film center is, wisely, not showing the documentary about lynch, &quot;pretty as a picture,&quot; probably because after you watch it you HATE david lynch.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>