Chicagoist: Be Careful What You Wish For

guest

Thu, 05 Jul 2007 22:31:05 -0600

do you have to pump your blog so full of opinionated words... And because, in our opinion pointless to mention obvious insanity

guest

Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:43:10 -0600

Geez. Do those people have kids?

guest

Tue, 03 Jul 2007 08:27:14 -0600

what's a rusty trombone? is that like a dirty sanchez?

guest

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:36:28 -0600

I mean, lots of people enjoy sharing their wives... I would never share my girlfriend/wife-to-be, Kevin--especially since I am more than man enough to satisfy her. I would, however, still be more than happy to be on the receiving end of a rusty trombone from yours. Whaddya say?

guest

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:41:35 -0600

Uh, that is a piece of cake. What else do people think of as a piece? There are two forks. Two people, sharing the same piece.

guest

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:24:37 -0600

Please note sarcasm in Guest #9 comment.

Kevin Robinson

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:55:47 -0600

I understand why everyone thinks this is so freaky. I mean, lots of people enjoy sharing their wives, or watching their wives fuck other guys because they aren't man enough to satisfy her. Lots of people do it, way more than you think. There are probably ten cuckolds in your office right now, and a hotwife sitting on the Metra back home with you this evening. The only difference between them and this couple is that they have the presence of mind to actually do what they want sexually, rather than try desperately to please their spouse, against their own will and self-esteem. They both got what they deserve, and a pox on all three of them for giving kinky freaks a bad name.

Amanda Dickman

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:25:23 -0600

guest 7: I couldn't agree more, just highlighting the absurdity of the case. guest 8: I wondered the same thing myself ... how could she claim after the fact that she was hurt by his request if she willingly obliged?

guest

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:19:56 -0600

Actually, the picture serves no purpose. Signed, The Grey Guest

guest

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:18:41 -0600

oh, in that case the picture makes all kinds of sense....

guest

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:14:00 -0600

Not that the guy isn't at fault for making the request and then being surprised when it backfired, but shouldn't Natalie have just said no? Granted, he DID give her a free pass to cheat on him, which it seems she wanted to do anyway.

guest

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:09:27 -0600

As a juror, you're not at liberty simply to ignore laws you consider ridiculous. It's quite possible that every member of the jury thought the concept of alienation of affections to be chauvinistic and antiquated; they would still have had to render a verdict based on the application of that law with regard to the plaintiff's claim.

Amanda Dickman

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:08:57 -0600

The picture serves 2 purposes. The "having your cake and eating it too" as well as making a wish before you blow out a candle on a cake ("wish" is in the title...get it?)

guest

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:03:12 -0600

Half eaten cake = "Having your cake and eating it too."

guest

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:01:03 -0600

Maybe i'm too slow to pick up on the connection, but what does a picture of a half-eaten cake with two forks have to do with this story?

Amanda Dickman

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:51:58 -0600

Right on, Chuck. This just goes to show that stupidity has no bounds.

guest

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:51:48 -0600

wow, all I can say is wow. maybe someone should think about taking those weird old laws off the books? I know its often easier just to leave them there and not enforce them, but then this stuff happens, and damn. Stupidity reigns.

Chuck Sudo

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:11:06 -0600

In addition to the $4800 Arthur Friedman won, he also has the privilege of being labeled toxic to any women who might find him even remotely attractive. Spend those damages wisely.