<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Sox Sign Buehrle</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/07/09/sox_sign_buehrl.php</link>
<description>All comments for Sox Sign Buehrle</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/07/09/sox_sign_buehrl.php#comment-1142847</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/07/09/sox_sign_buehrl.php#comment-1142847</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:19:35 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;You know, I kind of like the &quot;Chicagoist&quot; third-person schtick. It harkens back to the olden days of journalism, sort of like the New York Times referring to everyone as &quot;Mr. Man&quot; or &quot;Ms. Woman.&quot; A nice throwback for new media. I say keep it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/07/09/sox_sign_buehrl.php#comment-1142825</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/07/09/sox_sign_buehrl.php#comment-1142825</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:56:27 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Is anyone else just completely fed up with everything being referred to as &quot;Chicagoist?&quot;

Yes.

It would be less aggravating if &quot;Chicagoist&quot; wrote like HST.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>The Curmudgeon</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/07/09/sox_sign_buehrl.php#comment-1142398</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/07/09/sox_sign_buehrl.php#comment-1142398</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:00:35 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Is anyone else just completely fed up with everything being referred to as &quot;Chicagoist?&quot;

More like:

&quot;Benjy Lipsman had spent part of Saturday afternoon watching Buehrle pitch...&quot; because certainly not all the Chicagoist authors were watching the Sox. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/07/09/sox_sign_buehrl.php#comment-1142348</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/07/09/sox_sign_buehrl.php#comment-1142348</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:05:47 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Good for the Sox...even as a Cubs fan this thing was really starting to piss me off.  When I heard rumors that the MLBPA tried to block the deal because they thought he could get more money on the open market I was livid.  I&apos;ve always thought Buehrle was a punk but I have a lot of respect for any player who gives his team a hometown discount in this day and age.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>kookybites</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/07/09/sox_sign_buehrl.php#comment-1142301</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/07/09/sox_sign_buehrl.php#comment-1142301</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 09:07:06 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s about time.

Now let&apos;s see if we can trade Contrerras and Dye.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>