guest

Sat, 14 Jul 2007 08:24:42 -0600

Well, they can be FORCED by subpoena to testify in front of a grand jury, OR Stebic can 'let' them be interviewed at the Children's Advocacy Center by professionals trained in dealing w/ children. In the end, the choice of the two will have been made--directly or indirectly--by Craig Stebic. Course, we all know the latter would be best for the children. And any reasonable person would guess they WANT to help in the search for their Mom. But we also all know their best interest is hardly front and center for Craig Stebic.

Spav1

Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:07:30 -0600

I would NEVER let my kids (if I had them) be interrogated by the government about their mother's disappearance. They have been through enough. Polygraphs are NOTORIOUSLY unreliable, which is why they aren't accepted in court. These facts do not make someone a murderer. Anyone rational would react that same way.

Chicagoist: The Final Amy Jacobson Post This Week, Unless Something Else Develops

guest

Spav1