Why should billionaires have all the fun? Pretty much any sports fan has fantasized about how they'd run their favorite team if they owned it, and lots of people consider the Cubbies to be their favorite team.
A number of them are using the Cubs' impending sale to try to get a piece of the team, even if they don't quite have a 10-figure bank account.
Eric Majeski formed 4 Fans Sake, through which he wants to find other Cubs fans willing to buy shares in the Cubs. Under Majeski's plan, shared would be sold for $100 with individuals limited to to $100,000. He has requested an ownership application from MLB and hopes to work with banks to hold money for the bid in escrow.
Majeski's not the only Cubs fan hoping to line up other fans to bid for the Cubs. But some realize that a band of small investors isn't likely to be taken very seriously by the league.
Perhaps that why Brian Gongol wrote an open letter to Mark Cuban, looking to partner with the billionaire owner of the NBA's Dallas Mavericks. While Cuban has made formal overtures to buy the Cubs, he's clearly not the favorite of commissioner Bud Selig. Would a bid that includes the Wrigleyville riff raff help Cuban's bid?
Don't get us wrong, while we question the attempts at fan ownership of the Cubs, we certainly admire the movement and the idealism of those like Eric and Brian.
Both hold up the Green Bay Packers as an example for successful ownership in the hands of the community. But they're the exception to the rule. Football's revenue sharing, lucrative television rights, strict salary caps on team payroll, and prohibition of corporate ownership mean a financial structure very different from other pro sports.
Partnering with the likes of a Mark Cuban is probably a more likely way to go about gaining some element of fan ownership. The populist Cuban would seem to be more likely than another bidder -- the rest are willing to extend invitations to join their syndicate only as far as other multimillionaires. But does Cuban need the fans' help to buy the team? Or any of the other bidders? Not really. And more importantly than money, how can the grassroots bidders help navigate the politics among the league and other owners that would be required to become the winning bidder for the Cubs?
Update:
Our post prompted another group to let us know about their similar initiative -- Let's Buy the Cubbies. The group is accepting pledges ranging from $200 to $20,000 with the intension of firming up the pledges once the accumulated cash reached $600 million. So far they've received pledges from 46 people totalling $293,800. Like the others, they hold up the Green Bay Packers as inspiration.
Since so many fans are trying the same thing, and the money involved is such a huge chunk of change, might they be more successful were they to team up? Unify their pools of pledged funds, unify their PR campaigns and maybe the movement would get big enough to grab the attention of the bigger players. Maybe they would be willing to open up a small part of the team's ownership to the rank and file fans.
Image via WrigleyvilleSports.com



I think it would be a great step forward for Chicago if a populist Cuban purchased the cubs, perhaps a free health clinic would be operated at the stadium, the players would form collective programs to fund inner city schools and scholarship funds, during half time progressive speakers would address the baseball fans! The combining of sports and progressive politics might very well be a revolutionary way to promote social change and growth in America! Salute!
i don't understand how MLB or selig can stop someone from buying the team. if they are the highest bidder, why couldn't they buy it? shit, they let wayne huizenga buy the marlins and trash that team after he won a ring.
"i don't understand how MLB or selig can stop someone from buying the team. if they are the highest bidder, why couldn't they buy it? shit, they let wayne huizenga buy the marlins and trash that team after he won a ring."
Not sure but because the MLB is not a public company they have right of refusal for whatever reason. The owners want "RP" or the "right people" for the job, which really means that they will do the old white buddy club and not be a maverick, which is exactly the opposite of someone like cuban.
Not to mention the hand Jeffrey Loria had in killing the Montreal Expos.
An interesting battle could develop between the Tribune Co. and MLB, becuase as a public company the Trib has a responsibility to shareholders to get the highest possible price, while baseball may be more concerned with getting the "right" purchaser to buy the team. What happens if Cuban offers $1 billion and Canning only offers $850 million?
adding to Benjy's point, the MLB is very concerned about anti-trust laws. They're trying to prove they're not a trust and denying the highest bidder the right to purchase a team would go a long way towards showing that they are in fact a trust. Therefore, if Cuban bids the most the MLB would look very bad denying him the right to purchase the team. If Cuban wants the team, he'll probably get it. That being said, I think that Canning, along with some die-hard Cubs fans like Rich Melman and one of the Levy's would be good for Cubs fans.
letsbuythecubbies.com does this too
letsbuythecubbies.com
MLB has some special exemptions (anti-trust laws be damned) and has controls in place to choose from all reasonable bids whom they want to buy a team. See Boston's purchase a few years ago when John Henry wasn't the high bidder, but was deemed the more acceptable owner.
Since the Cubs are headed for the 2007 World Series, isn't this discussion moot?
Damn, I can't type that with a straight face...
1 billion for the cubs might be overvalued considering someone announced that if the yankees went for sale it would fetch 1.5 billion.
Only problem is that MLB already has a rule prohibiting public ownership, and the league has repeatedly declined suggestions to overturn the rule.
what if those people set up a corporation?
Maybe you shouldn't have said that at all, jay, even in jest:
"Soriano out at least a month with quad tear."
I'm about to have a Nelson Muntz moment.