Chicagoist: Sehr Interessant

guest

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:55:53 -0600

"Was that you, or your vagina, talking?" way to be sexist. marty should try having a cyber-stalker and see how he likes that. or do big, strong men not have to deal with silly things like that?

guest

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:50:46 -0600

it's hard to argue against the freedom to say what you want online, but at the same time, i'm incredibly tired of reading people's comments when they lost the constructive part of their criticism, offer no real debate and in many cases are just viciously attacking people with words they wouldn't have the "balls" to say in person. what started out as such a great new form of information and communication has given way to operating like the cattiest of high school fights. it's pretty hard to set guidelines, but i'm tired of assholes who have nothing better to put people down.

guest

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:23:13 -0600

what are my thoughts on libel? how about "i'm worried for you guys." i completely agree with guest 3 - alicia was cutting it VERY close there. also, i presume that that the lorelle guide has been widely distributed to chicagoist staff, right?

guest

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:46:29 -0600

I have to say, I thought along these lines when I read Alicia Dorr's take on Anand Tiwari. I don't think she crossed the libel line, but she was hovered damned close to it.

marty

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:53:16 -0600

...commenters who spend their entire day viciously tearing others to shreds under pseudonyms, most of the opinions being touted aren’t always taken seriously. Sorry Chicagoist, I couldn't hear you. Was that you, or your vagina, talking?

guest

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:44:19 -0600

This is why this guest refuses to sign up for a Chicagoist account.