<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Olympic Village to Move West?</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/13/olympic_villiag.php</link>
<description>All comments for Olympic Village to Move West?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/13/olympic_villiag.php#comment-1195921</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/13/olympic_villiag.php#comment-1195921</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:04:15 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Oops. Sorry Kevin. You are exactly right.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Kevin Robinson</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/13/olympic_villiag.php#comment-1195896</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/13/olympic_villiag.php#comment-1195896</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:48:26 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, the Chicago Tribune citation is in my post. 

It&apos;s the second link.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>E</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/13/olympic_villiag.php#comment-1195834</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/13/olympic_villiag.php#comment-1195834</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:48:12 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Fair enough. It looks like the city&apos;s involvment would mostly be excercising eminent domain, which might be somewhat reasonable if we&apos;re actually getting the Olympic nod, but fairly outrageous if we&apos;re not. Especially if there&apos;s a buyer interested in the property. Olympics or not, I have a feeling this Olympic village is going to be a big albatross hanging on this city for a long time.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/13/olympic_villiag.php#comment-1195789</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/13/olympic_villiag.php#comment-1195789</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:16:59 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;E,
Private developers are slated to do the development. That was in the Tribune. Perhaps it was not in the Sun-Times, which Kevin Robinson cited. A $1.1 billion development in the South Loop seems like a stretch unless people can get mortgages again, but letting a private developer do it is fine by me.

8:21,
The marshalling yards are crucial to the operation of McCormick Place. McCormick Place is crucial to Chicago&apos;s economy. Thus, any deck over the yards would need to be built to preserve the yards. The Tribune article on this indicated that this was a real architectural/engineering challenge. Better to have unsightly yards than no functioning McCormick, regardless of whether Chicago gets the Olympics.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>E</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/13/olympic_villiag.php#comment-1195757</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/13/olympic_villiag.php#comment-1195757</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:52:21 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Regardless, officials have said that they will go forward with the $1.1 billion project even if Chicago doesn&apos;t get the nod to host the Olympics.&quot;

Good to see that the money the city promised not to spend on the Olympics is going to get spent on the Olympics even if we don&apos;t get the Olympics. I love this city.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/13/olympic_villiag.php#comment-1195661</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/13/olympic_villiag.php#comment-1195661</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:21:04 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;with my limited knowledge of this change, i think its a boneheaded idea. sure, they dont want to go over budget creating a deck like millenium park...at the same time i dont think 200 trucks in a staging area will be seen as an appealing view for any future athletes/residents&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
