http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php All comments for Griese To Replace Grossman en-us 2009 Marcus Gilmer Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss marcusisabadass@gmail.com marcusisabadass@gmail.com 60 http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206663 http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206663 Comments Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:30:49 -0600 <p>Orton is also not a factor because he has a hard time completing even 50% of his passes. Griese won't wow us with his deep ball, but he usually completes nearly 60% of his passes and has a much better TD/INT ratio than Orton.</p> http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206520 http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206520 Comments Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:22:05 -0600 <p>Praise the lord.</p> http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206453 http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206453 Comments Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:54:54 -0600 <p>Bob Griese is Brian's father. God, thank you Chicagoist, that article headline made me want to cry with joy. Like you said the QB position and offense isn't the only problem, but it's the main problem. If the offense can stay on the field and actually score touchdowns, that will give the defense less time on the field and more time to rest.</p> http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206243 http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206243 Comments Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:21:35 -0600 <p>Orton is not a factor because the Bears are paying Griese more than Grossman and Orton make combined. He better get the job done. </p> http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206215 http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206215 Comments Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:00:06 -0600 <p>in the immortal words of Jerry Seinfeld...Good luck with all that.</p> http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206204 http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206204 Comments Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:50:03 -0600 <p>I cheered when Rex came back from those injuries and took the field. He was amazing at Florida. I've been holding my breath on every offensive possession since then. Take us home, Griese. Why couldn't we have gotten Westbrook?</p> http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206199 http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206199 Comments Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:44:27 -0600 <p>We have bigger problems than replacing Rex right now. The running game has been lackluster, and we're losing defensive starters left and right.</p> http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206187 http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206187 Comments Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:28:31 -0600 <p>I have a question for people who know these things better than I... why is Orton not in the equation at all? I thought he did a decent job a couple years ago holding the offense together for the majority of the season? It seems like putting time into developing him for the future would be a good idea. Could someone please explain?</p> http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206174 http://chicagoist.com/2007/09/26/griese_to_repla.php#comment-1206174 Comments Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:12:43 -0600 <p>When I saw this headline, I thought Griese? Isn't he an old man? Shows you how long it has been since I followed football. Is Brian related to Bob?</p>