<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Ask Chicagoist: Old Numbering System?</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/11/ask_chicagoist_16.php</link>
<description>All comments for Ask Chicagoist: Old Numbering System?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 07:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>twopennykid</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/11/ask_chicagoist_16.php#comment-1217701</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/11/ask_chicagoist_16.php#comment-1217701</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:43:38 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Note this passage from the Chicago Public Library&apos;s timeline:

&quot;An exception was between Madison Street and 31st Street where 1200 numbers were assigned between Madison Street and 12th Street, 1000 numbers between 12th Street and 22nd Street, and 900 numbers between 22nd Street and 31st Street.&quot;

That&apos;s right--&apos;100 numbers are used per block, eight blocks make up a mile&apos; is NOT TRUE between Madison and 31st. It&apos;s one mile from Madison to Roosevelt (12th), one mile from Roosevelt to Cermak (22nd) and one mile from Cermak to 31st.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/11/ask_chicagoist_16.php#comment-1217393</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/11/ask_chicagoist_16.php#comment-1217393</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:39:29 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;nice question. funny thing is that i used to live in that building. steepest steps i&apos;ve ever walked up.
- c:dub&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Stephen</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/11/ask_chicagoist_16.php#comment-1217342</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/11/ask_chicagoist_16.php#comment-1217342</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:09:00 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Chicagoist - do you know if the change in numbers is also related to the changes of several street names?

For example, Robey Street is now Damen Avenue, and Lincoln Street is now Wolcott Avenue.  Wasn&apos;t sure if those changes came in the same sweeping change of numbers, or if those appeared over a much greater span of time.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/11/ask_chicagoist_16.php#comment-1217302</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/11/ask_chicagoist_16.php#comment-1217302</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:24:04 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The &quot;Ask Chicagoist&quot; entries are some of the best on this site.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Shannon</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/11/ask_chicagoist_16.php#comment-1217288</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/11/ask_chicagoist_16.php#comment-1217288</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:12:11 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;geekily fascinating.  i&apos;ve seen dischordant numbers between houses and doors as well.  the eeriest evidence i&apos;ve seen of the old numbering system are lists of victims of the iriquois fire, circa 1903.  very few &apos;E.&apos;s and &apos;W.&apos;s on those streets.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>