<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: The CTA&apos;s Weather Warning: Necessary?</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php</link>
<description>All comments for The CTA&apos;s Weather Warning: Necessary?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Von Erich</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222409</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222409</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:01:24 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah.  I got mine at 11.04p last night.  Nice warning.  At first I thought it meant for this morning.
From now on, I want alerts every minute that state that everything is OK.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Sarah</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222363</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222363</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:17:24 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the question was more *why* did the CTA send this alert. Have they sent these types of alerts in the past? I&apos;m not aware of any.

I have a friend who received hers at 8:44 p.m. yesterday. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Fancypants1</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222266</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222266</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:39:28 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So people are going to bitch if CTA doesn&apos;t warn anyone about delays, and they&apos;re going to bitch if CTA does?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>billymax85</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222235</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222235</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:00:30 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;People did receive it if they registered their regular Chicago card. That&apos;s what happened to me. In fact, if I remember right, the email said it was sent from &quot;Chicago Card&quot; or &quot;Chicagocard&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>pantagrapher</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222172</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222172</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:44:55 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I received my alert at 5:28 p.m. I was already on my way home by then, but I appreciate the idea.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>JAH</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222161</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222161</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:33:19 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I received this alert - at 2:56 am Friday.  It&apos;s a good idea, but someone&apos;s email servers (the cta&apos;s or hotmail&apos;s) screwed it up.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>the new guest number 2</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222120</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222120</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:49:06 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;A technical difficulty at the CTA!? Pee-shaw, *that* could never happen within such a smooth running organization.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Rachelle Bowden</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222119</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222119</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:33:48 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I have the Chicago Card Plus and I never got the alert. I don&apos;t really mind, since everyone was reporting bad storms were on the way. I was just wondering how they decided who got the alert and who didn&apos;t. Maybe there was some tech difficulty if they sent it to all Chicago Card Plus holders, but only some got the email.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ed Knittel</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222116</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222116</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:12:40 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I received the alert at 2:05pm yesterday. I got the email because I have the Chicago Card Plus. Others may have received it if they have registered their regular Chicago Card.

How do I know? I use a unique email address specifically for my CCP.

I think the alert was good. If the CTA is going to be more proactive about things I&apos;m all for it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mojowen</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222064</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222064</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:25:12 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Lamest alert ever.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>xlprq</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222048</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222048</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:59:45 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I got the alert at 8:30 p.m. ... long after i was home and it never rained on the Northwest side&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>JoeM500</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222025</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1222025</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:27:10 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I slept like a baby until my alarm went off 5 minutes ago ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Rachelle Bowden</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1221999</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1221999</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:30:07 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;there was hail in river north @ about 5:30. only lasted a minute or two.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Chuck Sudo</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1221977</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/18/the_ctas_weathe.php#comment-1221977</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:47:48 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Golf ball-sized hail for about two minutes down here at Chicagoist&apos;s Bridgeport Bureau.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>