http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/23/extra_extra_78.php All comments for Extra, Extra en-us 2009 Marcus Gilmer Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss marcusisabadass@gmail.com marcusisabadass@gmail.com 60 http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/23/extra_extra_78.php#comment-1224171 http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/23/extra_extra_78.php#comment-1224171 Comments Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:34:09 -0600 <p>Maybe for the sake of say, fairness, Chicagoist should recuse itself from further commenting on the Sliwinski trial. Whereas the Trib offers "driver's illness disputed" Chicagoist does the hard job of thinking for us and distills the story down to useful bits of incompleteness-- She...ain't...nuts. A sin of omission given her own doctor's statements to the contrary. Why don't you just hang the b*tch? Seems like that's what you're really after given the "coverage" thus far. Or am I misinterpreting? Vermin, you are the Riffs of avitars. </p> http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/23/extra_extra_78.php#comment-1224081 http://chicagoist.com/2007/10/23/extra_extra_78.php#comment-1224081 Comments Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:15:02 -0600 <p>Way to go Chicagoist! Makin' some calls, findin' out who's that "reverend" and where his store front "church" is? That's right Slum Times...I know you fell out but is you woke yet?!</p>