<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Bears Lose Adrian Peterson Bowl</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/12/18/bears_lose_adri.php</link>
<description>All comments for Bears Lose Adrian Peterson Bowl</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>kookybites</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/12/18/bears_lose_adri.php#comment-1253803</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/12/18/bears_lose_adri.php#comment-1253803</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:16:32 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I also enjoyed the brilliant idea to run Garrett Wolfe, who is smaller than our punter, when we&apos;re backed up against our own goal line.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Tower18</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/12/18/bears_lose_adri.php#comment-1253755</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/12/18/bears_lose_adri.php#comment-1253755</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:27:50 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;When a team is consistently trying to convert 2nd and shorts with runs on the ground, it&apos;s telling you how little faith they have in their offense to get the job done on 3rd and short.&quot;

EXACTLY.  2nd and 1 is a luxury down.  That&apos;s why they should be using it to try for TDs or at least mid-range gains.  Not running off-tackle (which hadn&apos;t worked all day) to try to pick up the 1 yard.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mike_thoms</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/12/18/bears_lose_adri.php#comment-1253703</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/12/18/bears_lose_adri.php#comment-1253703</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:32:54 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Stupid play calling all year long.  Time to ditch Turner and get someone who has a pair and who can get creative.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>kookybites</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/12/18/bears_lose_adri.php#comment-1253646</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/12/18/bears_lose_adri.php#comment-1253646</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:28:19 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;With Lovie continuing to treat us like we&apos;re idiots and claiming they&apos;re still trying to do everything possible to win, I&apos;m surprised he didn&apos;t call a time out at the end as well.

When a team is consistently trying to convert 2nd and shorts with runs on the ground, it&apos;s telling you how little faith they have in their offense to get the job done on 3rd and short.

I do not want to see Devin Hester on offense ever again.

And Tarvaris Jackson just sent Brian Urlacher to the pro bowl.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>pantagrapher</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/12/18/bears_lose_adri.php#comment-1253638</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/12/18/bears_lose_adri.php#comment-1253638</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:23:38 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I was surprised Lovie didn&apos;t call his last timeout with 15 seconds on the clock after Jackson took a knee on third down. Trailing by one score, why not make the Vikings punt it? It gives the Bears only a slim chance to pull something off, but it would have been a chance nonetheless. Instead, Lovie just gave up.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Slaphappy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/12/18/bears_lose_adri.php#comment-1253629</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/12/18/bears_lose_adri.php#comment-1253629</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:10:37 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Why is that stupid playcalling? 2nd and 1 is the biggest luxury of a down in football -- you can do whatever you want. If you want a stupid play call, go with the pass play they went with on 4th and 1. It&apos;s a yard. Smash forward and the odds predict that you&apos;ll get it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Tower18</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/12/18/bears_lose_adri.php#comment-1253625</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/12/18/bears_lose_adri.php#comment-1253625</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:03:59 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The game was over when, at some point in the second quarter, the Bears had 2nd and 1 from inside Minnesota&apos;s 30.  Perfect play action, take a shot at the end-zone down, right?  No, they ran the ball off-tackle for no gain.  Now you have 3rd and 1.  I forget what happened, but I&apos;m positive they didn&apos;t score a touchdown.

Stupid playcalling.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Tower18</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2007/12/18/bears_lose_adri.php#comment-1253622</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2007/12/18/bears_lose_adri.php#comment-1253622</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:02:37 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The game was over when, at some point in the second quarter, the Bears had 2nd and 1 from inside Minnesota&apos;s 30.  Perfect play action, take a shot at the end-zone down, right?  No, they ran the ball off-tackle for no gain.  Now you have 3rd and 1.  I forget what happened, but I&apos;m positive they didn&apos;t score a touchdown.

Stupid playcalling.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>