<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Siskel Cancels Obama Documentary Screenings</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/08/siskel_cancels.php</link>
<description>All comments for Siskel Cancels Obama Documentary Screenings</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>simplecreature</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/08/siskel_cancels.php#comment-1267102</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/08/siskel_cancels.php#comment-1267102</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:50:58 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I really respect the Siskel center for looking out for the appearance of impopriety. 

Contrast this to Mike Huckabee sweating it out at mega-churches promising to soldier on for jesus. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>E</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/08/siskel_cancels.php#comment-1267006</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/08/siskel_cancels.php#comment-1267006</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:20:06 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;*Blatantly. Stupid IE always makes me forget to spellcheck while I&apos;m at work...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>E</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/08/siskel_cancels.php#comment-1267004</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/08/siskel_cancels.php#comment-1267004</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:18:42 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Besides, the movie is totally campaign propaganda, perhaps not blatently, but Axelrod will use any platform possible to get his guy out there.

The Gene made the right call on this one.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>sparky</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/08/siskel_cancels.php#comment-1266939</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/08/siskel_cancels.php#comment-1266939</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:22:09 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;FT: If a NFP is a 501(3)(c), and you endorse a candidate, this is considered campaigning.  The NFP can lose their exempt status if they engage in campaigning. Because Siskel is technically part of the School of the Art Institute, and the Art Insitute is NFP, they don&apos;t want to take the risk. It makes sense.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>pantagrapher</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/08/siskel_cancels.php#comment-1266937</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/08/siskel_cancels.php#comment-1266937</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:20:51 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;FT, not when the IRS comes along.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>FreeTransfer</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/08/siskel_cancels.php#comment-1266883</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/08/siskel_cancels.php#comment-1266883</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:32:11 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Couldn&apos;t they maintain status at a NFP by, you know, not making a profit?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>