<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: CTA Buying New El Cars</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php</link>
<description>All comments for CTA Buying New El Cars</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>The Curmudgeon</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1277496</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1277496</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:11:38 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Seat Fabric...

Is anyone else disappointed that new, modern subway cars feature seat fabric? Fabric has got to be the #1 component involved in the stench and filth on the El simply because they rarely get clean and are difficult to clean.

I&apos;d be perfectly happy with comfortable, somewhat ergonomically correct seats made of plastic than more fabric seats that are just going to become disgusting after a week.

Look at the new buses in circulation. Those fabric seats are already filthy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>matty</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1277230</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1277230</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:34:44 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;ok after further review they don&apos;t suck. But don&apos;t expect the space age super galactic trains that we were promised with the new millenium.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>spookhatespuppies</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1277018</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1277018</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:43:00 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;And to second pskosey, I had a chance to observe Seattle&apos;s monorail upfront, and it&apos;s a piece of crap. And Las Vegas&apos; isn&apos;t much better. 

And they&apos;re both crazy expensive for the ride you get, which is slightly easier than walking.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>pskosey</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276859</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276859</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:53:59 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;but it looks like the CTA is sticking with the unimaginative regular rails. Sigh&quot; -At the risk of sounding like a trident commercial, Studies have shown that the most cost effective way to rapidly move mass quantities of people is through a rail system such as the CTA&apos;s. Monorail and other technologies may wow the masses but they aren&apos;t as efficient as the heavy rail cars of the CTA. Furthermore, to retrofit the entire system with new cars, tracks, platforms, switches etc. would cost in excess of $50 billion (yes BILLION). So the smart and correct choice is to stick with the current technology which, by the way, is the preferred mode for most major urban rail systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>spookhatespuppies</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276803</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276803</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:58:35 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, it worked for Brockway, Ogdenville and North Haverbrook. 

OK, seriously, I realize I need to cut down on the Simpsons, but I was sooo set up with the monorail reference.

Anyway, looking over that .pdf Kevin linked to, Munich&apos;s layout is pretty damn cool. And Beijing&apos;s looks like their trains have separate &quot;business class&quot; cars.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Kevin</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276653</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276653</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:29:26 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, the CTA already ordered the cars nearly two years ago. They just made some changes today like the live security cameras. Check out today&apos;s President&apos;s Report for some renderings of possible design changes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Tower18</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276649</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276649</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:27:01 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;South Side?  Not sure.  West Side?  Immediately.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Remote</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276604</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276604</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:56:01 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Any guesses as to how long it will take for some of these lovelies to land on the south side rail lines?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Stephen</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276587</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276587</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:47:48 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;biscuitcleaver: Yes.  They&apos;ve been waiting to pull the trigger on this deal for quite some time.  A good portion of the funds aren&apos;t a product of the &apos;doomsday&apos; debacle but rather FTA funds that have been reserved for capital improvements.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Fancypants1</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276575</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276575</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:41:23 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;they don&apos;t suck. they&apos;re cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>biscuitcleaver</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276563</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276563</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:37:37 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So soon after the disaster was averted?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>matty</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276503</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/01/23/cta_buying_new.php#comment-1276503</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:58:54 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;They look exactly like the ravenswood cars only with a different seating configuration LED Maps and and AC electricity (instead of DC). They kind of suck imo. at least they&apos;ll replace the dated ass blue line inward door trains. man those are broke ass trains!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>