<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Real Estate Transfer Tax Burden May Shift</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/11/real_estate_tra.php</link>
<description>All comments for Real Estate Transfer Tax Burden May Shift</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>matilda</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/11/real_estate_tra.php#comment-1310781</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/11/real_estate_tra.php#comment-1310781</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:21:17 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Boemelaar: Nice question, to which I have no answer.

And I think the Cook County sales tax increase, as well as some of the city&apos;s unofficial tax increases (TIFs, for instance) are dumb. I half-heartedly support the sales tax increase for the RTA agencies, as they needed it, though I wish a better funding source had been found. 


That said, let me ask: Everyone seems to say tax increases have no place in a tanking economy, as that will just make things worse. Yet, people during the good ole days of the mid to late 1990s, as well as during other economic good times, always seem to say that any taxes increase will kill growth. Is there ever a time to impose tax increases, or should we never, ever increase taxes? I am asking in a general way. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Chicago J</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/11/real_estate_tra.php#comment-1310757</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/11/real_estate_tra.php#comment-1310757</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:59:26 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;On April 1st the tax will have a double structure.  

The tax will increase to $10.50 for every $1000(from the current $7.50 per $1000).  

The council has decided that the tax will be charged to BOTH the buyer and the seller of the property.

The buyer will pay the current tax portion on the transfer i.e. $7.50 of the $10.50 tax rate.  

The seller will be required to pay the $3 increase to the City of Chicago.    &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>boemelaar</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/11/real_estate_tra.php#comment-1310753</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/11/real_estate_tra.php#comment-1310753</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:58:17 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i think mepps should be taxed for his double-posts and then follow ups to his double-posts. i hope those don&apos;t count as posting in the monthly tabulations. however, what he said i agree with 100%. the economy is tanking in large part due to real estate and chicago&apos;s answer is to increase taxes. can anyone explain that these tax increases are somehow economically beneficial to the chicago area and won&apos;t further depress the local market? is there something that i am missing?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mepps</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/11/real_estate_tra.php#comment-1310715</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/11/real_estate_tra.php#comment-1310715</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:40:48 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The damn double posting on this thing. 
I get an error that says it did not post, after the first time I hit submit. So I hit submit again, and then we get a double post.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mepps</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/11/real_estate_tra.php#comment-1310707</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/11/real_estate_tra.php#comment-1310707</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:35:51 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;With the spate of recent tax increases in the region, Chicago&apos;s been trying to find a way to ease the pain&quot;
That is the most ironic, BS sentence I&apos;ve read in a while- not because of you though Kevin. If Daley and commissioners truly wanted to find a way to ease the pain, why in hell would they keep tacking on these taxes?! THEY are the ones that increased the transfer and stamp tax several WEEKS AGO! IF they really gave a shit they would stop with all the bullshit real estate, entertainment, beverage, water bottle, plastic baggie bullshit! &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mepps</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/11/real_estate_tra.php#comment-1310705</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/11/real_estate_tra.php#comment-1310705</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:35:43 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;With the spate of recent tax increases in the region, Chicago&apos;s been trying to find a way to ease the pain&quot;
That is the most ironic, BS sentence I&apos;ve read in a while- not because of you though Kevin. If Daley and commissioners truly wanted to find a way to ease the pain, why in hell would they keep tacking on these taxes?! THEY are the ones that increased the transfer and stamp tax several WEEKS AGO! IF they really gave a shit they would stop with all the bullshit real estate, entertainment, beverage, water bottle, plastic baggie bullshit! &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>peteypants</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/11/real_estate_tra.php#comment-1310688</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/11/real_estate_tra.php#comment-1310688</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:23:03 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;apparently, one way to ease the pain is to make your own &quot;FOR SALE&quot; sign instead of buying those fancy, overpriced ones at the ace true value or menard&apos;s. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>matilda</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/11/real_estate_tra.php#comment-1310676</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/11/real_estate_tra.php#comment-1310676</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:15:33 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, Stone actually said something that made sense. I wonder who wrote it for him. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>