<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Sad Songs, Lush Sounds</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/19/sad_songs_lush.php</link>
<description>All comments for Sad Songs, Lush Sounds</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>YoknapatawphaTourismBoard</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/19/sad_songs_lush.php#comment-1317579</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/19/sad_songs_lush.php#comment-1317579</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:16:03 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;That&apos;s not to say I don&apos;t intend to give him a listen.  Thanks for the recommendation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>YoknapatawphaTourismBoard</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/19/sad_songs_lush.php#comment-1317569</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/19/sad_songs_lush.php#comment-1317569</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:11:52 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Songs about love won, lost, and lamented hasn&apos;t been anything new since the troubadours so it doesn&apos;t seem much worth noting does it?  Yet noting that an artist&apos;s songs are primarily about love seems to be endemic in rock critique.  I think I&apos;ve read the same thing about four times in the last month and I don&apos;t read very much music criticism.

I keep waiting for bopping British pop that explains how Heidegger&apos;s notion of subject-centered reason isn&apos;t the completion of metaphysics, but The Pipettes haven&apos;t gotten around to releasing it yet.  Just a matter of time.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>smussy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/19/sad_songs_lush.php#comment-1317427</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/03/19/sad_songs_lush.php#comment-1317427</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:56:57 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;fair warning: ---this has nothing to do with this post---

i&apos;ve resisted making a comment about the toyota corolla posts, because the very first one caused such a knee-jerk reaction in me, especially when i noticed that i was unable to make a comment on it.  i understand the need for advertising on the site, and don&apos;t have a problem with general concept. what i *do* philosophically object to is tying content up in an ad, and then tying our hands so we can&apos;t discuss what&apos;s in it.

as these posts have gone on, they&apos;ve had more and more interesting and useful content in them, and things that i&apos;ve often felt compelled to comment on ... except i can&apos;t.  it&apos;s a bummer, especially when i know that chicagoist strives to create an atmosphere of lively discussion and community and hopes to inform, entertain and engage their readers on a wide variety of subjects.

anyway, i&apos;m writing on your post because you wrote the last installment of &apos;living the dream,&apos; and i had no clue that you could ask starbucks to make you a cup of free trade coffee.  if you do that, and they open up a bag, and they don&apos;t use it all, does it go stale and go to waste?  shouldn&apos;t they be using *all* free trade coffee if they want to make a statement?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>