Area Soldier Killed In Fort Hood Rampage
Stroger Makes Hollywood Play
Put Down Your Nanowrimo And Leave The House
Sox Shuffle Continues
Many of you probably remember the famous Tinley Park UFO sightings from a few years back. Still skeptical about the sightings and the companion footage? Much of the footage will be presented at the UFO Symposium happening this Saturday in Tinley Park. Sam Maranto, director of the Illinois branch of the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) is confident in the authenticity of the Tinley Park sightings.
Maranto said he can prove "beyond a shadow of a doubt" the red lights spotted in Tinley Park were no flares.
Maranto is a "certified MUFON field investigator" so we guess that means he would know? Maranto is being joined on a panel by four other experts who will be presenting on all things UFO-related at the symposium, including Dr. Mark Rodeghier, President and Scientific Director of the J.Allen Hynek Center for UFO Studies, and writer Don Scmitt, who has recently co-authored a book, Witness to Roswell: Unmasking the 60-Year Cover-Up, with Tom Carey.
Honestly, kids, we don't know how to feel about all of this. This kind of thing is always ripe for mockery; it's almost too easy. But we'd also be lying if we said we didn't believe there are actually other forms of life out there in the universe. The universe is apparently a pretty big place so it would be kind of arrogant to think we're the only tenants, you know? [Southtown Star]
The UFO Symposium, Saturday March 29, 2008, 8 a.m. - 5p.m., $20 in advance, $25 at the door, Tinley Park Convention Center, 18501 S. Harlem Ave., Tinley Park, IL. Register at the Illinois Mutual UFO Network website.
Image via ankylosaur
add to stumble upon
add to reddit
tweet this
post to facebook
Sure, but even if you agree that:
a) The universe is vast
b) other forms of life are possible
There is NO guarantee that life form is capable of picking up off their planet and visiting us... light years away.
The odds behind alien life capable of interstellar travel are astronomical. And isn't it always funny that these aliens are almost always reported as humanoid in appearance, with eyes, mouth, appendages, etc.?
Our mouths and other features are the result of billions of years of development from simple systems. I just don't think evolution could strike twice so perfectly like that.
Hey, I'm with you. But those 'encounters' are different than UFO sightings and shouldn't necessarily be lumped together. Just because we haven't perfected the technology to zip billions of miles across space and time doesn't mean something else hasn't.
Again, I'm not trying to get all X-Files up in here, I just think it's possible. Once, I got really lost driving near Columbus, Georgia and stumbled across a Waffle House in the middle of NOWHERE (and trust me, southwest Georgia is NOT a place you want to be lost in the middle of the night). So it's possible ET got lost trying to get back on the Intergalactic version of I-90 and instead wound up in beautiful Tinley Park.
That story so did NOT end up where I thought it would...
I'd say the real shock here is that anyone is going to pay $25 at the door. I'd give chupacabara lectures if I could get a few dozen people in at 25 bucks a pop.
I can't see the acronym "MUFON" without thinking of the X Files, and all those women sitting around holding neck implants in various containers.
I'd like William Shatner to show up at the meeting and give his "Have you ever kissed a girl?" speech from SNL.
Oh man. 8/21/2004 was the day of the Chicago Air and Water show. Those aircraft magically appear at the lakefront, you know, without actually flying to and from there.
Peruse the UFO network database for Illinois reports at http://www.nuforc.org/webreports/ndxlIL.html. It's a hoot. It seems people don't actually look at the sky until they look at the sky and are flummoxed at all the bright stars, the planet Venus, airplanes, satellites, and here in Chicago, birds and plastic bags uplit by streetlights.
I don't see any reports concerning the UFO sighting over Highland though.
"The odds behind alien life capable of interstellar travel are astronomical."
Without disputing the nutbag status of the UFOologist crowd, or the extreme reasonability of this point
"And isn't it always funny that these aliens are almost always reported as humanoid in appearance, with eyes, mouth, appendages, etc.?
Our mouths and other features are the result of billions of years of development from simple systems. I just don't think evolution could strike twice so perfectly like that."
the first claim, as often as it has been reported, is a bit of a stretch. Over 125 billion galaxies, about 100 billion stars in this galaxy alone, suggests the presence of a lot of inhabitable planets, and the complete argument against the feasibility of interstellar travel seems to be "we don't know how to do it, yet".
Based on that argument, somebody in the 1920s could "prove" that the development of solid state electronics was an impossibility. (Early attempts to develop such in said era ended in failure). Yet here we are in the early 21st century using that very same impossible technoology to have a conversation about another impossible technology. The 20th century should have taught people to not leap to conclusions in such matters, and yet one can see people doing just that in large numbers, to this very day.