http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/14/quinn_calls_on.php All comments for Quinn Calls on Blago: Back Recall en-us 2009 Marcus Gilmer Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss marcusisabadass@gmail.com marcusisabadass@gmail.com 60 http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/14/quinn_calls_on.php#comment-1336936 http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/14/quinn_calls_on.php#comment-1336936 Comments Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:23:52 -0600 <p>Perhaps Blago said the he supported a "recall option" back around the time when he was a state rep, which would have been around the last time he and Quinn actually had a conversation. Blago should have give Quinn a major roll in his administration from day one, which would have kept Quinn occupied and happy, served the state well, and kept Quinn quite during all this scandal . Now the Lt. Gov Quinn has all the time in the world to take double barrel gun shots at Blago, because Jack Franks certainly didn't think up this bill by himself</p> http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/14/quinn_calls_on.php#comment-1336931 http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/14/quinn_calls_on.php#comment-1336931 Comments Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:53:51 -0600 <p>Why do we need recall? Our elected lawmakers already have the power of impeachment. If they don't want to wait for the next election, and really think the governor should be removed, our lawmakers should do their duty and impeach (and attempt to remove Blago from office) instead of making voters do the heavy lifting. This is what a republic is all about. </p>