http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/16/an_evening_with.php All comments for An Evening With The Royal Tenenbaums en-us 2009 Marcus Gilmer Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss marcusisabadass@gmail.com marcusisabadass@gmail.com 60 http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/16/an_evening_with.php#comment-1339440 http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/16/an_evening_with.php#comment-1339440 Comments Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:44:26 -0600 <p>@Mike Thoms: THAT was exactly what I was thinking. Once you share a credit with human beatbox Micheal Winslow, you're never allowed to criticize movies EVER. Me: Hey Tim, have a chance to see "Meet the Spartans" yet? Tim: Yes! And it was a triumph of the human spirit! Two thumbs WAY up!</p> http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/16/an_evening_with.php#comment-1339410 http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/16/an_evening_with.php#comment-1339410 Comments Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:23:36 -0600 <p>Can you really take umbrage with any movie when you've appeared in several Police Academy movies? Or are they just playing rolls in order to create a lively debate?</p> http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/16/an_evening_with.php#comment-1339403 http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/16/an_evening_with.php#comment-1339403 Comments Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:21:39 -0600 <p>Plumb - According to the info via the Columbia link, it looks like Patinkin defends while Kazurinsky takes umbrage with it.</p> http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/16/an_evening_with.php#comment-1339401 http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/16/an_evening_with.php#comment-1339401 Comments Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:20:10 -0600 <p>Sweetchuck...awesome. </p> http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/16/an_evening_with.php#comment-1339374 http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/16/an_evening_with.php#comment-1339374 Comments Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:07:09 -0600 <p>Did they say who takes what side on the movie?</p>