<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Extra, Extra</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php</link>
<description>All comments for Extra, Extra</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Spav1</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344573</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344573</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:15:43 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;@frp:

&quot;hyperbolic&quot; is one of my go to &quot;I am better than you words&quot;

some others include, &quot;garrish&quot;, &quot;substantially&quot;, &quot;obsequious&quot; and &quot;zero-sum&quot;


Why so harsh today dude?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>frp</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344554</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344554</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:03:29 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;While half of the comments I make are hyperbolic....&quot;

Someone&apos;s been reading their dictionary.  

And, hyperbolic is not how I would describe half of said comments...more like, uh, um, errr, inane, hebetudinous and vitriolic.  

I-can-has-multisyllabic-words, too!  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Spav1</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344443</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344443</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:57:36 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Margaret:

While half of the comments I make are hyperbolic, they would definitely lessen if you chose to address any of them in a way that was not by fiat or dictatory (not a word but apropos).

If you are going to shut down threads, why not link to a post that has some guidelines for commenting.  

I think that you fail to realize that it is the same 35-50 commentors that are really investing in this site, that comment daily, multiple times, resulting in longer time spent on the site and more pageviews and then you react in such a way that is mean-spirited. 

It is like, you&apos;re the adult, I&apos;m the child, same principle.  You owe it to me and to all the commentors to guide us with thoughtful suggestions and commentary, to explain when there is a change made and to not be utterly condescending in every endeavour you may undertake.  

Yuck. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Margaret Lyons</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344428</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344428</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:49:48 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, it&apos;s definitely tedious.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Spav1</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344426</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344426</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:47:48 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Besides my bitching at Margaret, which I admit may get tedious, my other comments have (had) gone far up in thoughtfulness.  That has all ended now that I can see it will never get me anywhere and I will continue to be called a &quot;bitch&quot; by the writers of this site. 

Shame on all of you. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mary_Sunshine</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344411</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344411</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:41:27 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Spav: 

I&apos;ve seen very few comments where you actually post anything that could be considered constructive criticism of the blog, mainly just bitching for the sake of bitching.  I&apos;m just saying if it&apos;s that bad, just walk away. We&apos;ll miss you but I promise we&apos;ll survive. 

And trite? Is that seriously the word you&apos;d pick? You can do better than that. 
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Spav1</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344361</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344361</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:12:31 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Mary Sunshine:

Why?

I am totally trying to make it better.  That is how invested I am.  I am NEVER leaving.

Seriously, how trite are you?  It is irritating. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mary_Sunshine</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344345</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344345</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:02:18 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Spav, clearly you need to find a new blog.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Margaret Lyons</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344333</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344333</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:50:35 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Rachelle posted CotM last month, too.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>frp</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344306</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344306</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:30:12 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;@JAH &quot;Even worse Spav1, they talk with us, about YOU!


True dat!  I sharted a little when I read your comment!  That shit&apos;s funny!  &quot;Yay&quot; for exclamation points!

Damn, my boss is standing right behind me....&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>JAH</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344270</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344270</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:07:43 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Even worse Spav1, they talk with us, about YOU!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Spav1</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344172</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344172</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:57:56 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Or Pinko:  

Maybe Chicagoist will sit passively by and not take any suggestions EVER from the commentors.  

Notice how Margaret DIDN&apos;T post the &quot;Commentor of the Month&quot;?  Ensuing shitstorm.  This site stifles commentor participation by continually having the writers comment in the threads in a defensive tone, by Queen Margaret descending from her mountain-top to tell us all to &quot;behave&quot;, by prematurely closing threads, et al, such as.  
 
I mean, don&apos;t hold your breath.

Also:  THEY TALK ABOUT US.  Do you think they don&apos;t?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Pinko</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344153</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344153</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:42:39 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome!  I was just watching the video of that story just before I read your comment...

Maybe Chicagoist should start a weekly &quot;caption&quot; contest for some of their more interesting photos?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>senaber</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344145</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344145</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:33:33 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow great photo-- mystery solved!

http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/americas/04/21/priest.balloons.ap/index.html?iref=hpmostpop&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>frp</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344117</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/04/21/extra_extra_197.php#comment-1344117</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:53:34 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Really? People at the Workplace Bullying Institute found incidences of workplace bullying?

Yes, Margaret.  Now get back to work!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>