http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/02/new_city_vacant.php All comments for New City Vacant Buildings Rules Delayed en-us 2009 Marcus Gilmer Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss marcusisabadass@gmail.com marcusisabadass@gmail.com 60 http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/02/new_city_vacant.php#comment-1354319 http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/02/new_city_vacant.php#comment-1354319 Comments Sat, 03 May 2008 16:50:18 -0600 <p>This is just another scam from the Mayor For Life to hammer anyone that hasn't hired or bribed his friends & family.</p> http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/02/new_city_vacant.php#comment-1354027 http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/02/new_city_vacant.php#comment-1354027 Comments Fri, 02 May 2008 17:45:18 -0600 <p>As long some mobbed up security firm is making money Im happy. This recession has been tuff, and with the Rezko thing and all. Wiseguys gotta eat too youz know</p> http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/02/new_city_vacant.php#comment-1353971 http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/02/new_city_vacant.php#comment-1353971 Comments Fri, 02 May 2008 16:38:51 -0600 <p>i'm not sure i understand the point of this ordinance. if the building ends up vacant for a long period of time, doesn't that imply some negligence on the part of the owner in the first place? what incentive would they have to keep the place up?</p>