<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Beavers Wants Juvie Head To Dress Up</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php</link>
<description>All comments for Beavers Wants Juvie Head To Dress Up</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>matilda</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358209</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358209</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:29:09 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Yok: touche, sir. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>frp</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358182</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358182</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:08:56 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;...hog with the biggest nuts....&quot;  

Nicely done Matilda.  And, yes, Yok, Beavers is using the media as is &quot;soapbox&quot;, of sorts, and is generally making an ass out of himself, per the usual.  

I tend to agree with Peraica -- Dunlap grows a pair and faces the commissioners or he submits to the process.  Unfortunately, this is more about politics than the actual job itself.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>YoknapatawphaTourismBoard</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358180</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358180</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:07:05 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, matilda, but how is this not a distraction from the serious issue listed in the second paragraph?  We seem to be participating in Beavers&apos; own charade.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>YoknapatawphaTourismBoard</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358172</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358172</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:00:59 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I get the point, Chuck.  But it&apos;s a poorly made point.  I can both get my job done and dress appropriately for the position.  It&apos;s just not that hard.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>matilda</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358169</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358169</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:59:28 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Yok, the point is that the hog with the biggest nuts is again playing a game of distraction because he just doesn&apos;t give a shit about anyone or anything but himself. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Chuck Sudo</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358159</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358159</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:53:35 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The point is the suit doesn&apos;t do the job. Dunlap may look like a slob, but he gets his job done, unlike Beavers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>YoknapatawphaTourismBoard</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358151</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358151</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:46:41 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;That&apos;s a lot of exclamation points there Scooter; an aweful lot of excitement over not much at all.

I don&apos;t see why this is:
a.) newsworthy
b.) debatable
Many jobs require a certain form of attire.  He can get a suit for $150 at any number of places.  Not a great suit, but whatever.  Throw in $50 for a shirt and tie.  Get three suits and five shirt/tie combinations.  Buy them over the course of four months.  Voila, for less than $200 a month, you&apos;ve got a work wardrobe that will last you a few years.  Replenish one suit and two shirt/tie combos per year.

Not too hard, kids.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>peteypants</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358150</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358150</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:46:17 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;burn! sounds like the commissioners have valid concerns but making fun of somebody&apos;s clothes is the  ultimate dis to a middle-aged man. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Scooter Libbby</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358126</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/08/beavers_wants_j.php#comment-1358126</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:30:58 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, that&apos;s the entire problem with the Audy Home, the director needs to wear $3000 bespoke suits all the time!

What an inexpensive way to solve the joints problems!
No need to hire qualified staff to help the unwanted &amp; abandoned kids.
No need to send them to school!
No need to try to keep young criminals out of further trouble so they won&apos;t end up in prison for decades!

Just buy the director a bunch of expensive suits!
One for each day of the week!
Only $21,000 a year!

WOW! What a saving for the taxpayers! &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>