<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: One Great Sandwich: Perry’s Combo</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php</link>
<description>All comments for One Great Sandwich: Perry’s Combo</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>smussy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369452</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369452</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 11:20:23 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;wow. i never would have guessed any of that stuff.  amazing. thanks, dressing gurus.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>shameshameboy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369413</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369413</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 10:38:28 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;ve never had a Perry&apos;s sandwich that wasn&apos;t worth the weight. (Lazy pun intended.)  The Combo is delightful, but P.J.&apos;s Paradise -- a triple decker with tuna salad and sugar-cured BACON -- is also mind-numbingly good.  And they cook their own brisket.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>shameshameboy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369404</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369404</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 10:30:40 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Russian dressing is traditionally made with a yogurt base, but mayonnaise is a common substitute.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>chemmuse</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369396</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369396</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 10:26:57 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;While they are both tomato based salad dressings, Russian dressing is actually closer to Thousand Island than it is to French Dressing.  In fact, if a mayonnaise base is used, the only difference that may be noticed between Russian and Thousand Island is that Russian is sharper.  French Dressing is a vinaigrette with tomato and sugar.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>smussy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369299</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369299</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:34:11 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;talk about jerry seinfeld ... is perry the &quot;cell phone nazi?&quot;  

but back to dressing. i seriously want to know what the difference between russian and french dressing is.  tom robbins says &quot;there are no synonyms,&quot; so there must be a difference.  one of you foodies must be able to tell me.

and i ask why no one&apos;s talking about it anymore, because it seems like russian dressing was more of an option when i was a kid. i never hear anyone even mention it anymore.  these are things that are curious to me. if only i *could* make millions with these thoughts.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jjlthree</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369226</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369226</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:19:14 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
Irishman - I agree wholeheartedly.  No one has to go to Perry&apos;s if they don&apos;t want to - or if they want to blabber on the phone while at lunch.

Places that are cell phone free are a tiny fraction of businesses and a welcome one.  As Jerry the barber used to tell the rare customer whose phone rang in his shop, &quot;This is where I conduct my business.  If you want to conduct yours, step outside.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>irishman1</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369123</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369123</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:24:10 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I go to Perry&apos;s occasionally, and the place is always packed for lunch!

If you do not want to go to Perry&apos;s b/c of their cell phone policy, no...big...deal.  

Don&apos;t go. 

The place is always packed at lunch with people!

I think it is quite amusing that die hard cell phone users are feeling &quot;disrespected&quot; by the sign.  That &quot;disrespect&quot; is EXACTLY how I feel when I have listen to some jackass on their cell phone on a train or bus yapping away about what bar they are going to later. 

For that, I thank Perry&apos;s...for it is a place where I can go and not encounter the aforementioned jackass.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Lunch_lady</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369067</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369067</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:34:40 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;For quiet during lunchtime in the Loop try St.Peter&apos;s in the Loop.

I am not joking they have great programming,queit, a bookstore and more.

I know, I am lunch lady librarian.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>delta_</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369035</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369035</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:09:32 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, just another thought, does this include pagers, or &quot;beepers&quot;? 

HOT DOG BEEPERS FOR EVERYONE! &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>pencil</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369031</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369031</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:04:38 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I think it&apos;s not the request to abstain from cell phone use, but rather the tone of the request that is offensive.  

I agree that defining me as someone who &apos;thinks they are so important&apos; if I pull out my phone while eating a sandwich is a big turn off.  It was after I read the language of the sign that I lost interest in trying the place.

If the sign had simply read &quot;no cellphones allowed, ever&quot;, I don&apos;t think I would have balked.  I don&apos;t deny being sensitive... I read the sign as an insult.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>delta_</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369012</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369012</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:53:11 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I hope they create hot dogs in the shape of &quot;cell&quot; phones. Or just hot dog bricks. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ophmarketing</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369010</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1369010</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:52:38 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, yeah, yeah...if he wants to say &quot;please be courteous when using your phone,&quot; or &quot;please refrain from using your phone when ordering,&quot; or even &quot;please respect other customers by turning off your ringer while in the restaurant,&quot; that&apos;s fine. But having an ALARM go blaring if someone&apos;s phone DARES to go off in his precious dive is just that restaurant owner being a dick.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Amy Mikel</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1368999</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1368999</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:46:56 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;its like that other post about proprietor signage.  people seemed to think that was inappropiate, too.

i personally think that, within reason, the owner of a business has a right to clearly state how he expects his customers to act.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Chuck Sudo</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1368989</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1368989</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:41:52 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;@Oph: And if you&apos;re too much of a technophile to understand that, in 2K8, a privately owned business like Perry&apos;s can still refuse service to customers who don&apos;t show what they expect to be a bare minimum of courtesy when they walk into their establishment, too damned bad.

@ smussy: Who are you? Jerry Seinfeld?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ophmarketing</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1368971</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1368971</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:29:31 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;You know, I&apos;m sure the sandwiches are just wonderful, but that whole sanctimonious &apos;no cell phones&apos; crap just rubs me the wrong way. This isn&apos;t 1995. Having a cell phone in 2008 doesn&apos;t mean you&apos;re &apos;important&apos;, or even that you &apos;think&apos; you&apos;re important. It just means you&apos;re breathing and possibly employed. I have a cell phone, I&apos;ll use the cell phone if I need to. If Perry is too much of a luddite to understand that, too damned bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>smussy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1368969</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1368969</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:28:00 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;russian dressing.  how come no one ever talks about russian dressing anymore? and what exactly *is* the difference between russian and french dressing?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>delta_</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1368830</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/22/one_great_sandw_19.php#comment-1368830</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:48:44 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Their 3 foot long hot dog is KILLER. It comes with a gallon of smiles. (for free of course). &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>