<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Witness To Testify Three Is The Magic Number For R. Kelly</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/27/witness_to_test.php</link>
<description>All comments for Witness To Testify Three Is The Magic Number For R. Kelly</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Kevin Bracken</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/27/witness_to_test.php#comment-1371529</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/27/witness_to_test.php#comment-1371529</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 21:39:23 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This trial is such a witch hunt. 

Leave the dude alone - the real problem with child pornography has nothing to do with this case. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>YoknapatawphaTourismBoard</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/27/witness_to_test.php#comment-1371171</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/27/witness_to_test.php#comment-1371171</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:20:11 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;chaun: Lack of cooperation from parents (essential in IL statutory rape cases), lack of cooperative victim.  The video in the statutory case might be ruled inadmissable without either of these two things.  In the child porn case, it is the case.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>chaun</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/27/witness_to_test.php#comment-1371151</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/27/witness_to_test.php#comment-1371151</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:01:36 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;If he really did what they allege he did, why is he up on only child porn charges and not statutory rape charges?  Seems like that would be (if true) the real crime here, not video taping it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Spav1</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/27/witness_to_test.php#comment-1371109</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/27/witness_to_test.php#comment-1371109</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:12:36 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The defense did great with the witnesses.  I think the trial is leaning heavily in R&apos;s favor.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>