http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/29/review_mado.php All comments for Review: Mado en-us 2008 Marcus Gilmer Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:00:00 -0600 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss marcusisabadass@gmail.com marcusisabadass@gmail.com 60 http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/29/review_mado.php#comment-1373257 http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/29/review_mado.php#comment-1373257 Comments Thu, 29 May 2008 15:15:05 -0600 <p>all of the meat selections were excellent - though I will admit the lamb pate needed more fat. They're still working out the kinks.</p> http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/29/review_mado.php#comment-1373248 http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/29/review_mado.php#comment-1373248 Comments Thu, 29 May 2008 15:09:18 -0600 <p>I'm sorry, raw Guanciale? Can you even eat raw Guanciale? That's pork soaked in a salty brine. Everything else looks awesome.</p> http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/29/review_mado.php#comment-1373167 http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/29/review_mado.php#comment-1373167 Comments Thu, 29 May 2008 14:09:36 -0600 <p>@matty, looks like there's two different terrines, and two different cured meats (a salume and capicola, perhaps?). Alas, no sweetbreads on that charcuterie plate, tho.</p> http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/29/review_mado.php#comment-1373105 http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/29/review_mado.php#comment-1373105 Comments Thu, 29 May 2008 13:26:20 -0600 <p>No, those aren't sweetbreads... But that charcuterie plate looks awesome. Was the lamb pate good?</p> http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/29/review_mado.php#comment-1373051 http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/29/review_mado.php#comment-1373051 Comments Thu, 29 May 2008 12:54:08 -0600 <p>Also are those sweetbreads?</p> http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/29/review_mado.php#comment-1373049 http://chicagoist.com/2008/05/29/review_mado.php#comment-1373049 Comments Thu, 29 May 2008 12:53:10 -0600 <p>HAVE. TO. GO!</p>