I'm irritated at the RBC for even conceding that much.
All of Hillary's foam-mouthed supporters -- including this "enlightened" woman -- should be angry with their state Democratic headquarters. They are the ones who tossed away their constituents' votes, not Obama, the RBC or anyone else. It is voters like these that give me great concern regarding Obama's chances in the general election -- a sizable portion of these voters are threatening to vote for McCain, when all Obama did was beat Clinton fair and square under pre-determined rules.
What burns me up is that the candidates themselves agreed to the sanctions -- it wasn't until Hillary was losing and needed those votes did she cry foul. It's one thing to try to claim Florida, but Michigan? A state where she was the only one on the ballot? It's unbelievable to me that people are out there attempting to justify "the will of the voters" when the assumption can be made that a sizable number of voters couldn't vote for the candidate they wanted. What kind of shit is that?
Area Soldier Killed In Fort Hood Rampage
Stroger Makes Hollywood Play
Put Down Your Nanowrimo And Leave The House
Sox Shuffle Continues
add to stumble upon
add to reddit
tweet this
post to facebook
I'm irritated at the RBC for even conceding that much.
All of Hillary's foam-mouthed supporters -- including this "enlightened" woman -- should be angry with their state Democratic headquarters. They are the ones who tossed away their constituents' votes, not Obama, the RBC or anyone else. It is voters like these that give me great concern regarding Obama's chances in the general election -- a sizable portion of these voters are threatening to vote for McCain, when all Obama did was beat Clinton fair and square under pre-determined rules.
What burns me up is that the candidates themselves agreed to the sanctions -- it wasn't until Hillary was losing and needed those votes did she cry foul. It's one thing to try to claim Florida, but Michigan? A state where she was the only one on the ballot? It's unbelievable to me that people are out there attempting to justify "the will of the voters" when the assumption can be made that a sizable number of voters couldn't vote for the candidate they wanted. What kind of shit is that?