<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Chicago School</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/02/chicago_school_35.php</link>
<description>All comments for Chicago School</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Slaphappy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/02/chicago_school_35.php#comment-1375855</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/02/chicago_school_35.php#comment-1375855</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:52:39 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m irritated at the RBC for even conceding that much.

All of Hillary&apos;s foam-mouthed supporters -- including this &quot;enlightened&quot; woman -- should be angry with their state Democratic headquarters. They are the ones who tossed away their constituents&apos; votes, not Obama, the RBC or anyone else. It is voters like these that give me great concern regarding Obama&apos;s chances in the general election -- a sizable portion of these voters are threatening to vote for McCain, when all Obama did was beat Clinton fair and square under pre-determined rules.

What burns me up is that the candidates themselves agreed to the sanctions -- it wasn&apos;t until Hillary was losing and needed those votes did she cry foul. It&apos;s one thing to try to claim Florida, but Michigan? A state where she was the only one on the ballot? It&apos;s unbelievable to me that people are out there attempting to justify &quot;the will of the voters&quot; when the assumption can be made that a sizable number of voters couldn&apos;t vote for the candidate they wanted. What kind of shit is that?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>