<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: &quot;Pharmacy America Trusts&quot; Settles Drug-Switching Case</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/04/pharmacy_americ.php</link>
<description>All comments for &quot;Pharmacy America Trusts&quot; Settles Drug-Switching Case</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Ward Up</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/04/pharmacy_americ.php#comment-1377604</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/04/pharmacy_americ.php#comment-1377604</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:02:54 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;What this story reminds of is that CVS was exposed for doing the same thing a few years ago.

At that time, my pride in Chicago-born Walgreens made me sneer at CVS.  Now it turns out I had nothing to sneer about.

The problem with the CVS case and with the Walgreens case is that fines are given to the company, hitting the shareholders in the pocket, while there will be no criminal charges against the persons who actually perpetrated the fraud.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mepps</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/04/pharmacy_americ.php#comment-1377530</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/04/pharmacy_americ.php#comment-1377530</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:13:30 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Is switiching like that quiditch game?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
