<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Coldplay&apos;s A&apos;Comin&apos;!</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php</link>
<description>All comments for Coldplay&apos;s A&apos;Comin&apos;!</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>lamgray</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382800</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382800</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:21:20 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Heard the album, seen the Itunes commercial, saw that Eno produced it.

The ONLY surprise is that they didn&apos;t call the album &apos;Joshua Tree&apos; or at least if there was Spanish in the title, call it &quot;Uno, Dos, Tres, Catorce&quot;  I&apos;m SHOCKED!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Tankboy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382622</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382622</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:50:35 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, they&apos;ve released two singles from the album so far, &quot;Violet Hill&quot; and &quot;Viva La Vida.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jones33</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382616</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382616</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:47:21 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
&quot;We&apos;re still waiting for the band to come to their senses and release the strongest track on the album, &quot;42,&quot; as a single, but until then, this&apos;ll have to do.&quot;

What a ridiculous statement.  You make is sound as though the album has been out for ages but last I checked, the street date isn&apos;t until June 17th and the first single release is just now approaching it&apos;s peak.

I agree &quot;42&quot; is a single contender but let&apos;s at least allow the album to get (officially) released and let the singles take nature&apos;s course.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ingrid</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382533</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382533</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:56:43 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;My teenage son asked me what I thought of the new album. I said that it pretty much sounds like anything else they&apos;ve ever done...it&apos;s almost like &apos;ambient&apos; music to me at this point.

He said that after a while, they start sounding like his teachers and he just tunes them out. And by that I guess he meant the same thing I did...ambient background music.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>kaylee</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382426</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382426</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:38:48 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;@mike thoms:  Oh my god, you are my hero for saying that.  I feel so very guilty for digging what I&apos;ve heard off this new album.  I&apos;ve admitted it to three people so far: the first was safe as she has no qualms about saying she likes them; the second is a pompous ass about music and mocked me mercilessly; the third was blessedly mum about the whole thing.

I own their first album thanks to a friend at the time thinking I&apos;d like it; this is the first one I think I&apos;ll actually pay money for, and plan on listening to the free stream on MySpaz tonight.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>JoeM500</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382375</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382375</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:09:45 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I have gone all of these years without ever hearing them (if they have even been around &quot;all these years&quot;) and I am hoping to keep it that way.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>matilda</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382355</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382355</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:57:16 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;In the interest of full disclosure, don&apos;t you think you should acknowledge the fact that the ad for the new album is all over this site? I&apos;m just sayin...

So, you are asking for Chicagoist to disclose something about which you are already aware?

Odd. 

How about this: You make up your own mind whether the writing is a slave to the ads. Psuedo-disclosure has no bearing in that. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Marcus Gilmer</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382346</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382346</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:54:02 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The new record is pretty good, but deep down isn&apos;t it really just another Coldplay record? Don&apos;t get me wrong: Eno&apos;s production seems to lend a nuance to the songs that was absent before, I really dig some of the songs, and it&apos;s been on repeat on the ol&apos; iPod. But it still feels like to me that you could put their entire catalog on &quot;shuffle&quot; and whatever mix you got you wouldn&apos;t really notice a difference. Of course, you could say the same for a lot of bands I like....&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mike_thoms</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382340</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382340</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:48:24 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;god help me, i like these guys.  i consider myself a music snob but I like these guys.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Tankboy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382335</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382335</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:46:41 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;How strange! We actually have no control over ads (that&apos;s attended to by the ad department, which is separate from editorial) so disclosure isn&apos;t really necessary.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mary_Sunshine</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382326</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/06/11/coldplays_acomin.php#comment-1382326</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:41:52 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;In the interest of full disclosure, don&apos;t you think you should acknowledge the fact that the ad for the new album is all over this site? I&apos;m just sayin...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
