Chicagoist: Extra, Extra

Ingrid

Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:29:49 -0600

I turned down a good job once because women could only wear skirts/dresses/pantyhose. I didn't think that was fair. If men could wear pants, why couldn't women? It makes me mad now just thinking about it.

smussy

Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:29:26 -0600

in the late 90's/early '00s, i was still required to be wearing pantyhose while working at at a bank. however, as far as pantyhose being sexy ... i think it depends on what you classify as "pantyhose." fishnets -- sexy. seamed stockings -- sexy. some hose with varying kinds of print/texture -- sexy. *i* think. but wearing them is a WHOLE other sitch.

Tower18

Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:36:08 -0600

["Gentlemen. I apologize. You may not relate to this topic, unless, of course, you think of pantyhose merely as sexy lingerie or you're one of the guys who has contributed to the rise in the sale of male pantyhose even as women's sales have drooped like underwear whose elastic has gone bad."] 1. Who things pantyhose are at all sexy, aside from those with a fetish? 2. WTF? Men's pantyhose? Excuse me, but why?