<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Chicagoist: Peterson&apos;s Friends Allegedly Wore Wire</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php</link>
<description>All comments for Peterson&apos;s Friends Allegedly Wore Wire</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Marcus Gilmer</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>marcusisabadass@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Mary_Sunshine</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1417569</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1417569</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:48:22 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh Spook. Don&apos;t worry, she&apos;s here, you just haven&apos;t picked up on the signs. ;) &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jennyblur</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1416102</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1416102</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:45:12 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Ingrid:

Probably insurance money on wives 1 and 2. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ingrid</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1416093</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1416093</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:41:21 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Didn&apos;t he lose his pension?

What is he doing for those essentials....like lawyer fees?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jennyblur</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415914</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415914</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:08:23 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;smussy:

Apparently the friends are saying that Drew said certain things that were not recorded.  

Unless they can get it in under a hearsay exception (there are tons), then it is inadmissable.  

Hearsay exceptions include things like excited utterances and dying declarations.

If it isn&apos;t on tape, and he didn&apos;t actually confess to any crimes, then it is hearsay.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>smussy</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415899</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415899</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:57:08 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;well, they wore a wire ...?  wouldn&apos;t that mean they got it on tape? when i saw this on the front page of the S-T today (another hit for me and the S-T? bad ass Obama and now this? the world really IS coming to the end!), i was thrilled.  maybe they really will catch him.

i thought that them &apos;wearing a wire&apos; meant that the police set him up and they were listening in, making this official evidence.  god, i hope so.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jennyblur</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415828</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415828</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:18:20 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;If none of these statements were on tape, then it is hearsay and not admissable. 

If this guy is smart enough to kill several wives and get away with it, he is not going to shoot off at the mouth to even his friends.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>JawsOfJosh</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415827</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415827</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:17:54 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Shouldn&apos;t she be wearing a Hawaiian Tropic bikini in that photo? That would make a lot more sense than a photo suggesting she actually wants to be there.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>peteypants</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415732</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415732</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:26:07 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;creepy! especially the allegded request to model missing/presumed dead wife&apos;s swimwear...what about drew do women find so attractive? the bad-boy image, his red face?

this is playing out like season 1 of &quot;desperate housewives&quot;. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>poptart</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415689</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415689</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:01:49 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Prove him innocent of what? Being a creppy bastard? Doubtful....&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Spook</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415669</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415669</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:51:41 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;a young( barely 21) ChicagoistPoster named Spav1 was a good friend and defender of Petersons. But now she has disappeared! Of course Chicagoist Editor M.Lyons might have had something to do with this!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Albanyparkour</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415651</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415651</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:43:48 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Wait...Drew Peterson has friends?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>xlprq</title>
<link>http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415642</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chicagoist.com/2008/07/23/petersons_friends_allegedly_wore_wi.php#comment-1415642</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:39:16 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations, Chicagoist. I saw this on the news this morning and didn&apos;t pay attention because I said to myself, eh, Chicagoist will have it up at 4 o&apos;clock. You beat my estimate by almost five hours!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
